RE: RegEx to match Valid IP Address

2002-06-14 Thread Mat Harris
more important than knowledge. Knowledge is limited. >Imagination encircles the world." -- Albert Einstein [1879-1955] > > >-Original Message- >From: Mat Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 2:59 PM >To: Tim Musson; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subjec

RE: RegEx to match Valid IP Address

2002-06-14 Thread Jason Frisvold
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 2:59 PM To: Tim Musson; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RegEx to match Valid IP Address ok, maybe that is ok but I recently was told by a networking engineer that the last octet _shouldn't_ be 255. the first 3 can be i think. At 14:34 14/06/20

Re: RegEx to match Valid IP Address

2002-06-14 Thread Mat Harris
ok, maybe that is ok but I recently was told by a networking engineer that the last octet _shouldn't_ be 255. the first 3 can be i think. At 14:34 14/06/2002 -0400, Tim Musson wrote: >Hey Mat, > >My MUA believes you used NeoMail 1.25 >to write the following on Friday, June 14, 2002 at 9:04:54 AM

Re: RegEx to match Valid IP Address

2002-06-14 Thread drieux
On Friday, June 14, 2002, at 11:34 , Tim Musson wrote: > Hey Mat, > > My MUA believes you used NeoMail 1.25 > to write the following on Friday, June 14, 2002 at 9:04:54 AM. > > MH> actually, it should only be 1-254 inclusive as 255 is reserved for > MH> broadcast or other special addresses (some

Re: RegEx to match Valid IP Address

2002-06-14 Thread Tim Musson
Hey Mat, My MUA believes you used NeoMail 1.25 to write the following on Friday, June 14, 2002 at 9:04:54 AM. MH> actually, it should only be 1-254 inclusive as 255 is reserved for MH> broadcast or other special addresses (sometimes not used atall). MH> oficially the 255 node it ignored. I don'

Re: RegEx to match Valid IP Address

2002-06-14 Thread drieux
On Friday, June 14, 2002, at 06:04 , Mat Harrison wrote: [..] > actually, it should only be 1-254 inclusive as 255 is reserved for > broadcast or other special addresses (sometimes not used atall). > oficially the 255 node it ignored. that is actually a "dangerous" assertion to make. Since it ba

Re: RegEx to match Valid IP Address

2002-06-14 Thread Mat Harrison
actually, it should only be 1-254 inclusive as 255 is reserved for broadcast or other special addresses (sometimes not used atall). oficially the 255 node it ignored. > , > > I seem to recall a discussion on a RegEx to match an IP address, but > can't seem to find it. Anyone have any idea

RE: RegEx to match Valid IP Address

2002-06-14 Thread Hanson, Robert
Musson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 8:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RegEx to match Valid IP Address , I seem to recall a discussion on a RegEx to match an IP address, but can't seem to find it. Anyone have any ideas, or recall what it would be? Or could

RegEx to match Valid IP Address

2002-06-14 Thread Tim Musson
, I seem to recall a discussion on a RegEx to match an IP address, but can't seem to find it. Anyone have any ideas, or recall what it would be? Or could toss it together? First Octet is 1-255 inclusive, Second Octet is 0-255 inclusive, Third Octet is 0-255 inclusive, Fourth Octe