"Michael C. Davis" wrote:
> At 08:54 PM 2/27/04 -0800, R. Joseph Newton wrote:
> >I think it might also be good to refer the OP back to James' post, which
> he seems
> >to have overlooked. The caveat you provided earlier still makes sense.
>
> Thanks for the ideas. Are you referring to James' su
At 08:54 PM 2/27/04 -0800, R. Joseph Newton wrote:
>I think it might also be good to refer the OP back to James' post, which
he seems
>to have overlooked. The caveat you provided earlier still makes sense.
Thanks for the ideas. Are you referring to James' suggestion about always
using parens on
Rob Dixon wrote:
> Michael C. Davis wrote:
> >
> > At 01:31 AM 2/28/04 +1100, David le Blanc wrote:
> > >Now remember, a perl 'prototype' is not a prototype in the regular
> > >sense,
> > >but a method to override perl's natural greedy argument list collection,
> > >and a method to create function
James Edward Gray II wrote:
> On Feb 27, 2004, at 6:55 AM, Michael C. Davis wrote:
>
> > Hi list,
> >
> > I just ran across some unexpected results in passing arguments to
> > user-defined subroutines. Could someone who has been around Perl a
> > while
> > longer check this and make sure I'm seei
Michael C. Davis wrote:
>
> At 01:31 AM 2/28/04 +1100, David le Blanc wrote:
> >Now remember, a perl 'prototype' is not a prototype in the regular
> >sense,
> >but a method to override perl's natural greedy argument list collection,
> >and a method to create functions which emulate perl's builtins
At 01:31 AM 2/28/04 +1100, David le Blanc wrote:
>Now remember, a perl 'prototype' is not a prototype in the regular
>sense,
>but a method to override perl's natural greedy argument list collection,
>and a method to create functions which emulate perl's builtins (ie,
>provide
>hints to the expected
At 02:32 PM 2/27/04 -, Rob Dixon wrote:
>I haven't looked at this at all carefully, but my first guess would be
>be that you need to call the subroutine as if it was one:
>
> print MyProject::CoreConstants::EarliestValidTimestampAsNumber() + 1, "\n";
Yes, this certainly solves the problem I'm
David Le Blanc wrote:
>
> > From: Michael C. Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, 27 February 2004 11:55 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: subroutine call weirdness
> >
> > Hi list,
> >
> > I just ran across some unexpected results in passing arguments to
> > user-defined subro
Michael C. Davis wrote:
>
> I just ran across some unexpected results in passing arguments to
> user-defined subroutines. Could someone who has been around Perl a while
> longer check this and make sure I'm seeing this right?
>
> I've got some code that implements a constant as a subroutine call (
> From: Michael C. Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 27 February 2004 11:55 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: subroutine call weirdness
>
> Hi list,
>
> I just ran across some unexpected results in passing arguments to
> user-defined subroutines. Could someone who has been aro
On Feb 27, 2004, at 6:55 AM, Michael C. Davis wrote:
Hi list,
I just ran across some unexpected results in passing arguments to
user-defined subroutines. Could someone who has been around Perl a
while
longer check this and make sure I'm seeing this right?
I've got some code that implements a c
11 matches
Mail list logo
