Re: processing related elements in an array

2008-02-14 Thread MK
On 02/14/2008 09:33:51 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -> I admit, after making my post and taking a break, I had gotten a -> little ahead of myself when stating this problem. Basically, I had -> reached a point where I was able to get to @arr3, and couldn't figure -> the rest out; the previous stuf

Re: processing related elements in an array

2008-02-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I admit, after making my post and taking a break, I had gotten a little ahead of myself when stating this problem. Basically, I had reached a point where I was able to get to @arr3, and couldn't figure the rest out; the previous stuff I figured out. I felt I needed to come up with some background

Re: processing related elements in an array

2008-02-14 Thread Rob Dixon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hey, I hope someone can help me in calculating this: I can try. But your problem is poorly stated and I suspect you're mixing in parts of an imagined solution as well. It's best to describe the problem as cleanly as possible, as any prescriptions about the form of th