Re: Perl extensions: Arrays not coming through

2005-07-16 Thread Wiggins d'Anconia
Ernst Rohlicek jun. wrote: > > > Hi everbody, > > I got into Perl yesterday for using a Perl extension for PVM, a parallel > computing environment, but found out that some newer functions were not > yet in it. > > So, I added to the extension, but so far I couldn't figure out wrapping > a more

Re: perl extensions

2003-06-09 Thread Jenda Krynicky
From: "R. Joseph Newton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Jenda Krynicky wrote: > > No. The original distinction between *.pl and *.plx was the > > interpreter used for CGIs. > > The *.pl was interpreted by perl.exe, while *.plx was interpreted by > > perlIS.dll (In-process Perl interpreter for MS IIS). > >

Re: perl extensions

2003-06-09 Thread R. Joseph Newton
Jenda Krynicky wrote: > > > > "fyi > > > > .pl used to be used for both executables and libraries. > > > > A library is simply perl code located in a different file > > > > which is imported into another perl program with the 'require' > > > > keyword. > > > > > > > > Now t

Re: perl extensions

2003-06-08 Thread Jenda Krynicky
From: Tassilo von Parseval <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 10:33:21PM -0700 R. Joseph Newton wrote: > > Francis Henry wrote: > > > The following is a note from a colleague of which I am skeptical: > > > > > > "fyi > > > .pl used to be used for both executables and libraries. >

Re: perl extensions

2003-06-07 Thread Tassilo von Parseval
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 10:33:21PM -0700 R. Joseph Newton wrote: > Francis Henry wrote: > > The following is a note from a colleague of which I am skeptical: > > > > "fyi > > .pl used to be used for both executables and libraries. > > A library is simply perl code located in a differe

Re: perl extensions

2003-06-06 Thread R. Joseph Newton
Francis Henry wrote: > Hi: > > The following is a note from a colleague of which I am skeptical: > > "fyi > .pl used to be used for both executables and libraries. > A library is simply perl code located in a different file which is > imported into another perl program with the 're

Re: perl extensions

2003-06-06 Thread James Edward Gray II
On Friday, June 6, 2003, at 11:27 AM, Francis Henry wrote: Thanks Aman. I think I understand what he's trying to do - I'm more concerned that this is the common practice with perl and I wasn't aware of it. Know what I mean? I've at least heard of it before, if that tells you anything. I bel

Re: perl extensions

2003-06-06 Thread Francis Henry
Thanks Aman. I think I understand what he's trying to do - I'm more concerned that this is the common practice with perl and I wasn't aware of it. Know what I mean? Aman Raheja wrote: > What I think this note means to say it is to save the libraries ( small > subroutines saved as .pl in a diffe

Re: perl extensions

2003-06-06 Thread Aman Raheja
What I think this note means to say it is to save the libraries ( small subroutines saved as .pl in a different file, you might write for your program to make it look cleaner and by just doing require that .pl file you may use the subroutine.) All he's expecting to do is differentiate between the e