> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Blacklow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 8:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Order of operations!
>
>
> $pid = getppid;
> ...
> $run = "kill -9 $pid";
> system($run);
So is this your "automatic logout" mechanism?
1, 2001 4:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Order of operations!
.
Could be a problem of path of a.out
(Why you use kill -9 ? You can use a normal TERM signal, with kill $pid)
Walter
> Below is some perl code which works fine when executed locally, however
Could be a problem of path of a.out
(Why you use kill -9 ? You can use a normal TERM signal, with kill $pid)
Walter
> Below is some perl code which works fine when executed locally, however when
> I telnet to the system it is on and and it is run things are not run in the
> correct orde
Have you tried using the complete path to a.out? (ie
/home/myname/bin/a.out)
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Matthew Blacklow wrote:
> Below is some perl code which works fine when executed locally, however when
> I telnet to the system it is on and and it is run things are not run in the
> correct order.
It checks for the existence of a value and then increments if there is one.
> -Original Message-
> From: Cohan, Drew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 10:46 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: order of operations
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I don't understand somethin
Hi Drew,
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 11:45:34AM -0400, Cohan, Drew ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
spew-ed forth:
> Hi,
>
> I don't understand something about Perl's order of operations with this
> code:
>
> ...if ($name_count{$member}++)...
Using ++ (or --) after the variable will cause the current value to
