Re: Getopt::Std and warnings

2007-12-14 Thread reader
John W.Krahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Friday 14 December 2007 09:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> I want a warning message without having to do special coding with >> Getopt::Std. > > Getopt is one of those itches that a lot of people have felt like > scratching: > > http://search.cpan.

Re: Getopt::Std and warnings

2007-12-14 Thread John W . Krahn
On Friday 14 December 2007 09:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I want a warning message without having to do special coding with > Getopt::Std. Getopt is one of those itches that a lot of people have felt like scratching: http://search.cpan.org/search?query=getopt&mode=module If Getopt::Std or

RE: Getopt::Std producing unexpected results

2006-12-19 Thread RICHARD FERNANDEZ
> Getopt::Std only works with single hyphen switches, the only > exceptions being '--', '--help' and '--version'. > > perldoc Getopt::Std > > > Getopt::Std also processes swithes in clusters so "-abcd > filename" is the same as "-a -b -c -d filename". > > > With your command line: > > ./

Re: Getopt::Std producing unexpected results

2006-12-18 Thread John W. Krahn
RICHARD FERNANDEZ wrote: > Hi Folks, Hello, > I've written a little mytest.pl using Getopt::Std: > > > #!/usr/bin/perl > use warnings; > use strict; > use Getopt::Std; > > getopt('hl'); > our ($opt_h, $opt_l); > > my $hostname = $opt_h ? $opt_h : undef; > my $file = $opt_l ? $opt_l :

Re: Getopt::Std vs. Getopt::Long

2004-07-14 Thread Wiggins d Anconia
> I have been using Getopt::Std for some time and I'm pretty happy with it. > I've been reading about Getopt::Long and it seems to support everything in > Getopt::Std and has some nice conveniences. Does anyone have experience > converting scripts (or just development process) from Std to Long?

Re: getopt::std problem ignoring options

2003-01-30 Thread Wiggins d'Anconia
Jayesh Patel wrote: So to make my script dummy proof, I am trying to find easy ways of parsing the input the getopts ignores. I guess what I am looking for is a getopt::std that saves the part that it ignores in a special variable. Does anyone do this ? I don't like the getopt::long because

RE: getopt::std problem ignoring options

2003-01-30 Thread Jayesh Patel
Never mind. I found that ARGUE has exactly what I'm looking for. dumb mistake. Thanks, Jayesh -Original Message- From: Jayesh Patel Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 7:59 PM To: 'Wiggins d'Anconia'; Jayesh Patel Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: getopt

RE: getopt::std problem ignoring options

2003-01-30 Thread Jayesh Patel
-Original Message- From: Wiggins d'Anconia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 7:12 PM To: Jayesh Patel Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: getopt::std problem ignoring options Jayesh Patel wrote: > Hi all, > > Just wondering how

Re: getopt::std problem ignoring options

2003-01-30 Thread Wiggins d'Anconia
p.s. for those interested I have a cheat sheet I made a while ago at the following (I am sure I will clean it up at some point and make it harder to print ;-) but for now it is at least useful): http://danconia.org/online/GetOpt_QuickRef.txt -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For add

Re: getopt::std problem ignoring options

2003-01-30 Thread Wiggins d'Anconia
Jayesh Patel wrote: Hi all, Just wondering how some of you are handling this issue that I have. I am using the getopt::std. When I pass in parameters to my script with a possible mistake, the getopts ignores the rest of my switches. For example: script.pl -a something -b something else

Re: getopt::std problem ignoring options

2003-01-30 Thread kevin r
I am just a newbie here and this probably is not the best solution, but have you considered placing the argument in quotes. It works for me. script.pl -a something -b "something else" -c another_one -d etc Kevin From: Jayesh Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECT

RE: getopt::std problem ignoring options

2003-01-30 Thread Toby Stuart
> -Original Message- > From: Jayesh Patel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 8:15 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: getopt::std problem ignoring options > > > Hi all, > > Just wondering how some of you are handling this issue > that I have. > I am

Re: Getopt::Std issues

2002-08-02 Thread George Schlossnagle
you're specifying that -n takes an argument, but then passing it none, so it's interpreting the trailing -h as such, On Friday, August 2, 2002, at 01:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm not sure if this is a problem with Getopt::Std or if it's just me, > but > I'm having some issues getting

Re: Getopt::Std issues

2002-08-02 Thread ccurtis
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 01:32:52PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm not sure if this is a problem with Getopt::Std or if it's just me, but > I'm having some issues getting this to cooperate: > > use Getopt::Std; > my %OPT = (); > getopt('dhnt:', \%OPT); Oops, looks like I have to use getopt

RE: getopt::std

2002-05-21 Thread Mark Anderson
>>From: Bob Showalter >> From: Postman Pat >> >> Greetings, >> I am trying to do command line processing using the above >> lib, but am not >> quite getting the syntax from the PLEAC perl project. For >> instance I have >> the following args allowed: >> -s x.x.x.x | server.domain.com > serv

Re: getopt::std

2002-04-05 Thread Michael Lamertz
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 04:05:13PM -0500, Michael Gargiullo wrote: > I'm on a Redhat 7.0 box with the default install of Perl. I want to use the > Getopt::std module, but it's not installed. I went to cpan.org and they > have the docs, but it looks like that module is supposed to be installed >

Re: Getopt::Std problem

2001-12-16 Thread scarl-mitchell
> dan radom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I'm having a problem with Getopt. If I pass the -p option the script uses the proxy >as it should. If i pass it -p -o it ignores the unless (exists($args{o})) and writes >to $outfile anyway. Any idea why it's doing that? You want to use getopts() and

Re: Getopt::STD

2001-07-03 Thread Michael Fowler
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 07:13:58PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I've read through > http://search.cpan.org/doc/JHI/perl-5.7.1/lib/Getopt/Std.pm I wouldn't suggest using this as your reference for core Perl modules. You should use perldoc on the command-line, or failing that, www.perldoc.com