Kevin Pfeiffer wrote:
>
> Hi John,
Hello,
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John W. Krahn wrote:
> [...]
> > perldoc -q filehandle
> >
> > [snip]
>
> Hmmm... lots to digest here. One question. An example mentioned is:
>
>
>As of perl5.6, open() autovivifies file and direc
>
Hi John,
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John W. Krahn wrote:
[...]
> perldoc -q filehandle
>
> Found in /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/pod/perlfaq5.pod
>How do I flush/unbuffer an output filehandle? Why must I
>do this?
>
>How can I make a filehandle local to a subroutine? How d
Joshua Scott wrote:
>
> What do I need to do in order to use a filehandle that was opened earlier in
> a program within a subroutine?
perldoc -q filehandle
Found in /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/pod/perlfaq5.pod
How do I flush/unbuffer an output filehandle? Why must I
do this?
How
>
>
> What do I need to do in order to use a filehandle that was
> opened earlier in
> a program within a subroutine? I've included an example of
> the code I have
> that is not doing what I would like. Basically, I never get
> any output to
> the file. If I change it so that it doesn't use
Scott, Joshua wrote:
What do I need to do in order to use a filehandle that was opened earlier in
a program within a subroutine? I've included an example of the code I have
that is not doing what I would like. Basically, I never get any output to
the file. If I change it so that it doesn't use
Did open ever succeeded??
Check with:
open(FILE,">>$logfile") or die "$!";
-sharad
-Original Message-
From: Scott, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 11:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: File Handles in subroutines
What do I need to do in order t
Jean Padilla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, pravesh
> 1 - You are saying "mv < 2 - a file handle is *not* to be confused with a file name
Actually - Perl will let you do
our $FH = 'path';
open FH or die...; # open FH, '<', $FH
Doesn't work with 'my' variables, though.
> try :
>
> my $f
Hi, pravesh
1 - You are saying "mv <
> HI
> I define a file the following way:
>
> $FILE_HANDLE = "<
> then I openit
>
> open(FILEHANDLE);
>
> i perform some operations..
>
> and then I want to transfer this "somefile" to some other directory
>
> but I am not able to use mv comand to do i
> > this is the perl script : abc.pl(say) -- this is in my cgi-bin...
> >
> > #!/usr/bin/perl
> > print "content-type: text/html\n\n";
>
> You need to print html headers when you're printing to a browser, i.e.
>
> print "Content-type:text/html\n\n";
>
> -dave
I must be blind this morning...
> this is the perl script : abc.pl(say) -- this is in my cgi-bin...
>
> #!/usr/bin/perl
> print "content-type: text/html\n\n";
>
> open (IN, ">abc.txt");
> $x = ($inputs{name});
> print IN $x;
> close (IN);
>
> open (IN, "abc.txt");
> @arr = ;
> print @arr;
> close (IN);
>
> and this is th
--- Mike Breeze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -- Original Message --
> From: "Evgeny Goldin (aka Genie)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >> CODE 3:
> >> printit(*Some_Handle);
> >
> >> CODE 4:
> >> printit(\*Some_Handle);
> >
> >
> >If you're choosing betw
-- Original Message --
From: "Evgeny Goldin (aka Genie)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> CODE 3:
>> printit(*Some_Handle);
>
>> CODE 4:
>> printit(\*Some_Handle);
>
>
>If you're choosing between those two - CODE 4 looks better as it passes
>the reference to
> CODE 3:
> printit(*Some_Handle);
> CODE 4:
> printit(\*Some_Handle);
If you're choosing between those two - CODE 4 looks better as it passes
the reference to typeglob instead of the typeglob itself and passing
references is always the better way to do things.
CODE 4 is a usual way fo
13 matches
Mail list logo
