Re: better way to write this

2009-06-11 Thread Jenda Krynicky
From: "John W. Krahn" > Jenda Krynicky wrote: > > From: "raphael()" > >> It is actually very enlightening to read all the post > >> on this list. Most of the stuff actually goes over my head as > >> I have no need/knowledge of CGI or dbase. Just some text processing. > >> > >> I am new to Pro

Re: better way to write this

2009-06-11 Thread John Refior
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:10 AM, raphael() wrote: > Is there a better way to write this without modules? > OR is it just too simple & just fine written this way? > So if I understand correctly, you're trying to get files named like getthisfile01.txt through getthisfile10.txt, is that right? If

Re: better way to write this

2009-06-11 Thread John W. Krahn
Jenda Krynicky wrote: From: "raphael()" It is actually very enlightening to read all the post on this list. Most of the stuff actually goes over my head as I have no need/knowledge of CGI or dbase. Just some text processing. I am new to Programming/Perl (chapter 5 "Learning Perl"). I also

Re: better way to write this

2009-06-11 Thread Jenda Krynicky
From: "raphael()" > It is actually very enlightening to read all the post > on this list. Most of the stuff actually goes over my head as > I have no need/knowledge of CGI or dbase. Just some text processing. > > I am new to Programming/Perl (chapter 5 "Learning Perl"). > I also read a little