On 29/04/2011 13:17, C.DeRykus wrote:
This happened in 5.10 ... at least after 5.8.
From: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=89024
Just like the argument list of sub calls, The list over which
foreach
iterates is evaluated in lvalue context as required by foreach's
al
On Apr 29, 2:39 am, u...@stemsystems.com ("Uri Guttman") wrote:
> > "RD" == Rob Dixon writes:
>
> RD> On 29/04/2011 10:27, Uri Guttman wrote:
>
> RD> Good call Brian. It's not at all obvious that all the elements of a hash
> RD> slice will be created if they don't exist :)
> >>
> >>
> "RD" == Rob Dixon writes:
RD> On 29/04/2011 10:27, Uri Guttman wrote:
RD> Good call Brian. It's not at all obvious that all the elements of a hash
RD> slice will be created if they don't exist :)
>>
>> and they won't be anyhow. you need have lvalues to autovivify hash (or
>> a
On 29/04/2011 10:27, Uri Guttman wrote:
"RD" == Rob Dixon writes:
RD> On 29/04/2011 09:15, Brian Fraser wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:02 AM, Uri Guttman
wrote:
>>>
>>> so you can streamline yours with a slice:
>>>
>>> my $status = join '', grep defined, @jvalue{
> "RD" == Rob Dixon writes:
RD> On 29/04/2011 09:15, Brian Fraser wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:02 AM, Uri Guttman wrote:
>>>
>>> so you can streamline yours with a slice:
>>>
>>> my $status = join '', grep defined, @jvalue{ 0 .. 5 } ;
>>
>> This one was on purpose t
On 29/04/2011 09:15, Brian Fraser wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:02 AM, Uri Guttman wrote:
so you can streamline yours with a slice:
my $status = join '', grep defined, @jvalue{ 0 .. 5 } ;
This one was on purpose though - The slice might insert new keys into the
hash, and I recently spent
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:02 AM, Uri Guttman wrote:
>
> also why use qw for sequential numbers when a range will do?
>
> Because I went stupid and just blindly copypasted instead of thinking :)
Seriously, why use qw when I'm not _quoting words_?
> so you can streamline yours with a slice:
>
> m
> "BF" == Brian Fraser writes:
BF> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 4:27 AM, Agnello George
wrote:
>> Hi All
>>
>> is there a better way of writing this script
>>
>>
BF> "Better" is fairly subjective - And with only a part of the program,
there
BF> isn't much that can be said. Is
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Uri Guttman wrote:
>> "AG" == Agnello George writes:
>
> AG> is there a better way of writing this script
>
> this is not a script but a short code snippet. there are many ways to
> redo this. many questions could be asked as well.
>
> AG> my @resultss = qw
> "AG" == Agnello George writes:
AG> is there a better way of writing this script
this is not a script but a short code snippet. there are many ways to
redo this. many questions could be asked as well.
AG> my @resultss = qw( 0 1 2 3 4 5 ) ;
is that always a fixed list? could @jvalue h
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 4:27 AM, Agnello George wrote:
> Hi All
>
> is there a better way of writing this script
>
>
"Better" is fairly subjective - And with only a part of the program, there
isn't much that can be said. Is $status a global variable, or lexical?
On the other hand, if you mean mo
11 matches
Mail list logo
