Re: Trapping Windows Web Activity

2005-01-28 Thread James W. Thompson, II
Actually a content filter. On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 13:40:04 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > - Original Message - > From: "James W. Thompson, II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Friday, January 28, 2005 12:20 pm > Subject: Re:

Re: Trapping Windows Web Activity

2005-01-28 Thread mgoland
- Original Message - From: "James W. Thompson, II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Friday, January 28, 2005 12:20 pm Subject: Re: Trapping Windows Web Activity > The system would need to run on a single user machine, not a seperate > server and not require modific

Re: Trapping Windows Web Activity

2005-01-28 Thread James W. Thompson, II
The system would need to run on a single user machine, not a seperate server and not require modification of IE's internet options for example. It would need to intercept the request from the browser before it gets to the network interface. On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:13:46 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[

Re: Trapping Windows Web Activity

2005-01-28 Thread mgoland
- Original Message - From: "James W. Thompson, II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Friday, January 28, 2005 10:44 am Subject: Trapping Windows Web Activity > Out of curiosity is there any method for trapping Windows HTTP traffic > transparently, without establishing a proxy configuration, usin

RE: Trapping Windows Web Activity

2005-01-28 Thread Thomas Bätzler
James W. Thompson, II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked: > Out of curiosity is there any method for trapping Windows > HTTP traffic transparently, without establishing a proxy > configuration, using Perl. Probably not. Depending on what you want to do, a cheap solution might be to set up a Linux box as

Re: Trapping Windows Web Activity

2005-01-28 Thread Mat Harris
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 09:44:11 -0600, James W. Thompson, II wrote: > Out of curiosity is there any method for trapping Windows HTTP traffic > transparently, without establishing a proxy configuration, using Perl. > I am searching CPAN but can't find anything. I'm specifically looking > for a way