Hi Ganesh,
On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 14:16:29 +0530
ganesh vignesh wrote:
> stop mail to me
The instructions at the bottom of every E-mail read:
[QUOTE]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: beginners-unsubscr...@perl.org
For additional commands, e-mail: beginners-h...@perl.org
http://learn.perl.org/
[/QUOTE]
Ple
Hello, John.
On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 12:46:40 -0800
"John W. Krahn" wrote:
> > You should assign $marketInfo{$mkt} to a variable, or alternatively do:
> >
> > my ($start, $end) = @{$marketInfo{$mkt}}{qw(start end)};
> >
> >> my $end = $marketInfo{$mkt}->{"end"};
> >> if( $cell>=
Shlomi Fish wrote:
in addition to the good advice that Uri gave you - some comments on your code.
On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 07:40:09 -0600
Chris Stinemetz wrote:
I have a program that I am working on improveing. The fist step I have
taken is converting it in using the strict pragma.
Now when this
On 2011-12-04 18:12, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Chris wrote:
my $cell = substr($market,0,index($market,"_"));
print "$_ <", substr( $_, 0, index $_, "_" ), ">\n"
for qw/ foo1 foo2_bar foo3_bar_baz /;
foo1
foo2_bar
foo3_bar_baz
This can be more idiomatically (and more briefly) done us
Hi Chris,
in addition to the good advice that Uri gave you - some comments on your code.
On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 07:40:09 -0600
Chris Stinemetz wrote:
> I have a program that I am working on improveing. The fist step I have
> taken is converting it in using the strict pragma.
>
> Now when this subr
On 12/04/2011 08:40 AM, Chris Stinemetz wrote:
I have a program that I am working on improveing. The fist step I have
taken is converting it in using the strict pragma.
Now when this subroutine call is made I get the following compilation error:
Global symbol "$cell" requires explicit package n
Andy Greenwood wrote:
> I'm writing a script for work that will dig for DNS records for a
> given domain name and put the entries into an array. At the end of the
> digging, it outputs the array elements to the screen, asks if
> everything looks good, and if so, writes them out to the shell and
> b
On 11/16/06, Andy Greenwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
if (/^$domain.+MX\s+(\d+)\s+(.+)/) {
Because $domain is a string (and not a pattern), interpolating it into
a pattern could cause troubles. First, any metacharacters it contains
may affect the match. But also, is that pattern going
On 11/16/06, Jay Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/16/06, Andy Greenwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm writing a script for work that will dig for DNS records for a
> given domain name and put the entries into an array. At the end of the
> digging, it outputs the array elements to the sc
On 11/16/06, Andy Greenwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm writing a script for work that will dig for DNS records for a
given domain name and put the entries into an array. At the end of the
digging, it outputs the array elements to the screen, asks if
everything looks good, and if so, writes th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (TapasranjanMohapatra) writes:
> Now I use this module in another script. I want to call the sub routines, as
> suggested by the argument passed to the script.
> i.e.
> my_script q should call the sub routine zzzq,
> my_script e should call the sub routine zzze,
> ...
>
> whe
"Charles K. Clarkson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> TapasranjanMohapatra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> : Suppose I have many sub routines in a module abc.pm
> :
> : package abc;
> :
> : sub zzzq
> : {
> : }
> :
> : sub zzze
> : {
> : }
> : sub zzzr
> : {
> : }
> :
TapasranjanMohapatra wrote:
Hi All,
Hello,
I have a querry if the following can be possible.
Suppose I have many sub routines in a module abc.pm
package abc;
Your package should use strict and warnings :)
sub zzzq
{
}
sub zzze
{
}
sub zzzr
{
}
Now I use this module in another script. I want to cal
TapasranjanMohapatra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Suppose I have many sub routines in a module abc.pm
:
: package abc;
:
: sub zzzq
: {
: }
:
: sub zzze
: {
: }
: sub zzzr
: {
: }
:
: Now I use this module in another script. I want to call the
: sub routines, as suggested by the argument passe
"Michael C. Davis" wrote:
> At 08:54 PM 2/27/04 -0800, R. Joseph Newton wrote:
> >I think it might also be good to refer the OP back to James' post, which
> he seems
> >to have overlooked. The caveat you provided earlier still makes sense.
>
> Thanks for the ideas. Are you referring to James' su
At 08:54 PM 2/27/04 -0800, R. Joseph Newton wrote:
>I think it might also be good to refer the OP back to James' post, which
he seems
>to have overlooked. The caveat you provided earlier still makes sense.
Thanks for the ideas. Are you referring to James' suggestion about always
using parens on
Rob Dixon wrote:
> Michael C. Davis wrote:
> >
> > At 01:31 AM 2/28/04 +1100, David le Blanc wrote:
> > >Now remember, a perl 'prototype' is not a prototype in the regular
> > >sense,
> > >but a method to override perl's natural greedy argument list collection,
> > >and a method to create function
James Edward Gray II wrote:
> On Feb 27, 2004, at 6:55 AM, Michael C. Davis wrote:
>
> > Hi list,
> >
> > I just ran across some unexpected results in passing arguments to
> > user-defined subroutines. Could someone who has been around Perl a
> > while
> > longer check this and make sure I'm seei
Michael C. Davis wrote:
>
> At 01:31 AM 2/28/04 +1100, David le Blanc wrote:
> >Now remember, a perl 'prototype' is not a prototype in the regular
> >sense,
> >but a method to override perl's natural greedy argument list collection,
> >and a method to create functions which emulate perl's builtins
At 01:31 AM 2/28/04 +1100, David le Blanc wrote:
>Now remember, a perl 'prototype' is not a prototype in the regular
>sense,
>but a method to override perl's natural greedy argument list collection,
>and a method to create functions which emulate perl's builtins (ie,
>provide
>hints to the expected
At 02:32 PM 2/27/04 -, Rob Dixon wrote:
>I haven't looked at this at all carefully, but my first guess would be
>be that you need to call the subroutine as if it was one:
>
> print MyProject::CoreConstants::EarliestValidTimestampAsNumber() + 1, "\n";
Yes, this certainly solves the problem I'm
David Le Blanc wrote:
>
> > From: Michael C. Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, 27 February 2004 11:55 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: subroutine call weirdness
> >
> > Hi list,
> >
> > I just ran across some unexpected results in passing arguments to
> > user-defined subro
Michael C. Davis wrote:
>
> I just ran across some unexpected results in passing arguments to
> user-defined subroutines. Could someone who has been around Perl a while
> longer check this and make sure I'm seeing this right?
>
> I've got some code that implements a constant as a subroutine call (
> From: Michael C. Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 27 February 2004 11:55 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: subroutine call weirdness
>
> Hi list,
>
> I just ran across some unexpected results in passing arguments to
> user-defined subroutines. Could someone who has been aro
On Feb 27, 2004, at 6:55 AM, Michael C. Davis wrote:
Hi list,
I just ran across some unexpected results in passing arguments to
user-defined subroutines. Could someone who has been around Perl a
while
longer check this and make sure I'm seeing this right?
I've got some code that implements a c
25 matches
Mail list logo
