postfix is a drop in replacement for sendmail. as such the sendmail commandline can
still be used for delivering mails. Qmail has also been coded with security in mind.
However
(this is not thro personal experience), postfix seems to be quicker than qmail as far
as
queueing is concerned. Also po
On Thursday 15 November 2001 02:50 am, Miles Sapp wrote:
> I've heard Sendmail isn't a very good mail program because of security
> holes, etc. Can anyone recommend a good alternative script for sending
> mail from an HTML form? Thanks!
> Miles
Qmail and postfix.
postfix is written by security
I like postfix (postfix.org). It is pretty secure, easy to install and
maintain. It's only drawback (IMO) is that it can use a lot of inodes. Other
than that I am happier with it than I was when I used to have to configure
sendmail :)
Cheers,
Kevin
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 02:22:11PM -0800, Mile
bsm.com> cc:
Subject: RE: [Fwd: RE: Sendmail
alternatives]
11/14/01
2 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Fwd: RE: Sendmail alternatives]
I'm not referring to anything specific. I don't know that much about
it, I've just seen people say bad things about Sendmail on this mailing
list in the past and wondered if there is something better that is i
I'm not referring to anything specific. I don't know that much about
it, I've just seen people say bad things about Sendmail on this mailing
list in the past and wondered if there is something better that is in
common use.
Original Message --------
Subject: RE: Sendma
--howdy
--just a question: what version of sendmail are you
referring to? there are a slew of items that
has security measures (some of it is due in part of
your system security), but sendmail is getting
pretty good at telling people what they are and how
to fix it. as a rule of thumb, never g
