> Dermot wrote:
>> 2008/8/11 Rob Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>> - The usual reason for using a variable name with a leading underscore is to
>>> denote that it's a private variable, but lexical variables aren't visible
>>> outside the package anyway so you may as well drop the underscore and mak
From: "Mr. Shawn H. Corey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Yes, you have to do it after-the-fact, so to speak.
>
> #!/usr/bin/perl
>
> use strict;
> use warnings;
> use utf8;
>
> use Data::Dumper;
> $Data::Dumper::Sortkeys = 1;
> $Data::Dumper::Indent = 1;
> $Data::Dumper::Maxdepth = 0;
>
> my %_HASH;
Dermot wrote:
> 2008/8/11 Rob Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> - The usual reason for using a variable name with a leading underscore is to
>> denote that it's a private variable, but lexical variables aren't visible
>> outside the package anyway so you may as well drop the underscore and make it
>
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 03:00 +0100, Dermot wrote:
> I was struggling with this before I left work. In a line like
> print "Starting with ", $self->[0]->{type},"\n";
>
> I got
>
> Starting with HASH(x0023408)
>
> Not what as I was hoping for. Perhaps I was calling it correctly.
>
You are calling
2008/8/11 Rob Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Dermot wrote:
>>
>> Phew.
>>
>> I thought I was loosing my marbles there. I was staring at the screen
>> for ages trying to find a difference. To be fair, I think the
>> semi-colon were my balls-up :-/
>>
>> Yes Rob I am trying to do some OO. It might make
On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 20:28 +0100, Rob Dixon wrote:
> - To answer your question, yes it's a good idea to write accessor methods like
> type so that they will both read and write a value. But I would guess that you
> shouldn't be able to modify an object's type once it has been created?
There is mu
Dermot wrote:
>
> Phew.
>
> I thought I was loosing my marbles there. I was staring at the screen
> for ages trying to find a difference. To be fair, I think the
> semi-colon were my balls-up :-/
>
> Yes Rob I am trying to do some OO. It might make sense for what I'm
> after (upload different ty
2008/8/11 yitzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Rob Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> yitzle wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Dermot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am trying to make hash that refers to itself like this
my %_HASH;
%_HASH
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Rob Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yitzle wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Dermot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I am trying to make hash that refers to itself like this
>>>
>>> my %_HASH;
>>> %_HASH = (
>>> typeOne => {
>>> root => '/pa
yitzle wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Dermot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I am trying to make hash that refers to itself like this
>>
>> my %_HASH;
>> %_HASH = (
>> typeOne => {
>> root => '/path/to/typeOne',
>> logfile => $_HASH{typeOne}->{root}.'/logone.log';
>>
Not the way you are doing it. This would work, though:
my %_HASH;
%_HASH = (
typeOne => {
root => '/path/to/typeOne',
logfile => $_HASH{typeOne}->{root}.'/logone.log';
},
typeTwo => {
root => '/path/to/typeTwo',
logfile => $_HASH{typeTwo}->{root}.'/logtwo.l
On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 14:52 +0100, Dermot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to make hash that refers to itself like this
>
> my %_HASH;
> %_HASH = (
>typeOne => {
> root => '/path/to/typeOne',
> logfile => $_HASH{typeOne}->{root}.'/logone.log';
> },
>typeTwo => {
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
