Re: Reduce file size with Imager

2003-12-06 Thread R. Joseph Newton
Kevin Goodsell wrote: > Third, only in relatively bad cases will GIF require a byte for every > pixel. For example, I just created a solid white 200 by 200 image. > That's 40,000 pixels. The file size is 345 bytes. One byte per pixel is > what you would get if no compression was used at all (proba

Re: Reduce file size with Imager

2003-12-06 Thread R. Joseph Newton
Kevin Goodsell wrote: > Third, only in relatively bad cases will GIF require a byte for every > pixel. For example, I just created a solid white 200 by 200 image. > That's 40,000 pixels. The file size is 345 bytes. One byte per pixel is > what you would get if no compression was used at all (proba

Re: Reduce file size with Imager

2003-12-06 Thread Kevin Goodsell
R. Joseph Newton wrote: Eamon Daly wrote: Hi, all. I'm using Imager to create gifs, but the resultant file sizes are /huge/. I'm writing the files out like so: Are you doing animations? If not, skip the GIFs. You can get much better depth [16 million] in a lot less space with JPEG files. Som

Re: Reduce file size with Imager

2003-12-05 Thread R. Joseph Newton
Eamon Daly wrote: > Hi, all. I'm using Imager to create gifs, but the resultant > file sizes are /huge/. I'm writing the files out like so: Are you doing animations? If not, skip the GIFs. You can get much better depth [16 million] in a lot less space with JPEG files. Some of the compression al