} #ADDED LINE
}
Does that look reasonable? Other attempts to send the script garbage would just
cause it to tell you your answer was wrong, I think.
John M Rathbun MD
From: Jim Gibson
To: Perl Beginners
Sent: Mon, September 17, 2012 10:18:1
On Sep 17, 2012, at 6:52 AM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I apologise for having sent that to Dr. Rathbun in private - that was not my
> intention but a misuse of software. Resending to the list.
>
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 19:31:01 -0700 (PDT)
> jmrhide-p...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>> for (my $loopite
Hi,
I apologise for having sent that to Dr. Rathbun in private - that was not my
intention but a misuse of software. Resending to the list.
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 19:31:01 -0700 (PDT)
jmrhide-p...@yahoo.com wrote:
> for (my $loopiter = 0; $loopiter < $loopmax; $loopiter++) { #1
> if ($
e'll have the beast tamed!
Thanks for your helpful comments!
John M Rathbun MD
From: Shlomi Fish
To: jmrhide-p...@yahoo.com
Sent: Mon, September 17, 2012 3:01:19 AM
Subject: Re: Proposed correction
Hi,
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 19:31:01 -0700 (PDT)
jmrhide-p...
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 19:31:01 -0700 (PDT)
jmrhide-p...@yahoo.com wrote:
> for (my $i = 0; $i < @ary1; $i++) {Leaving aside other concerns, for
> the moment, is there a better way to write that first line?
You mean:
for my $i ( 0 .. $#ary1 ){
# ...
}
--
Just my 0.0002 millio
On 09/16/2012 03:46 PM, jmrhide-p...@yahoo.com wrote:
OK, here's my amateurish attempt at a correction:
i know you said you don't want to learn to be a professional coder. but
there are so many ways to improve your code little by little. most here
have been shying away for good reason and bec
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 12:46:08 -0700, jmrhide-perl wrote:
> Does it look OK?
This is a prime example of something that a test harness would be very
useful for, then we'd all know the answer.
There may be some entirely different reason why your provider thinks this
script is consuming excessive re
