Re: Pattern match operator

2013-05-04 Thread Jim Gibson
On May 4, 2013, at 11:53 AM, Florian Huber wrote: > On 05/04/2013 04:37 PM, Rob Dixon wrote: >> On 04/05/2013 14:26, Florian Huber wrote: >>> >>> >> >> Hello Florian >> >> First a couple of points >> >> - Don't use named captures for simple regexes like this. They make the >> code harder

Re: Pattern match operator

2013-05-04 Thread Florian Huber
On 05/04/2013 04:37 PM, Rob Dixon wrote: On 04/05/2013 14:26, Florian Huber wrote: I'm parsing a logfile and don't quite understand the behaviour of m//. From a previous regex match I have already captured $+{'GFP'}: use strict; use warnings; (...) $text =~ m/ (?FILTERS .*? WRT)/x;# I

Re: Pattern match operator

2013-05-04 Thread Rob Dixon
On 04/05/2013 14:26, Florian Huber wrote: I'm parsing a logfile and don't quite understand the behaviour of m//. From a previous regex match I have already captured $+{'GFP'}: use strict; use warnings; (...) $text =~ m/ (?FILTERS .*? WRT)/x;# I simply have my whole logfile in $text - I