Re: Package version numbers

2014-01-14 Thread John SJ Anderson
> Thanks for the test, John. In the book's example, they have: > > use v5.10; > > so I thought I was new enough, but maybe not. http://use.perl.org/use.perl.org/articles/10/04/13/1953252.shtml also notes it as a new feature in 5.12. I'm sure the authors regret the typo. ;^) j. -- To

Re: Package version numbers

2014-01-14 Thread SSC_perl
On Jan 14, 2014, at 4:04 PM, John SJ Anderson wrote: > I'm not sure exactly when that syntax was added, but for what it's > worth, it fails with 5.10.1 here too. Perl 5.12.5, on the other hand, > works. > > You may just need to upgrade. Thanks for the test, John. In the book's example, t

Re: Package version numbers

2014-01-14 Thread John SJ Anderson
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 2:50 PM, SSC_perl wrote: > I'm trying to number packages the way it's written about on page 406 > of Programming Perl, 4th ed., e.g. > > package Emailer 1.01; > > However, when I do that, I get the following error: > > syntax error at ss_files/Emailer.pm line 1, ne