Jim Conner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Perl is NOT an interpreted language (such as the BASIC language I learned in
>>high school, many, many years ago).
>
>Just a minor correction (semantics only). Perl *is* an interpreted
>language where BASIC and C are compiled languages. I believe everyone
At 04:41 PM 08.17.2001 -0700, Dean Theophilou wrote:
>Hello:
>
> I understand what you're saying but the fact remains: STRICTLY
> speaking,
>Perl is NOT an interpreted language (such as the BASIC language I learned in
>high school, many, many years ago).
Just a minor correction (semantic
PROTECTED]; Jon Acierto; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PERL IS NOT A HIGH LEVEL LANGUAGE and What is a Script
> "Dean Theophilou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I understand what you're saying but the fact remains: STRICTLY speaking,
> Perl is NOT an interpreted language
> "Dean Theophilou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I understand what you're saying but the fact remains: STRICTLY speaking,
> Perl is NOT an interpreted language (such as the BASIC language I learned in
> high school, many, many years ago). Sure, there is an interpreter, but
> there is also a
Hello:
I understand what you're saying but the fact remains: STRICTLY speaking,
Perl is NOT an interpreted language (such as the BASIC language I learned in
high school, many, many years ago). Sure, there is an interpreter, but
there is also a compile phase (which is the point you sorta
