Re: Netiquette

2006-06-23 Thread Mr. Shawn H. Corey
On Sat, 2006-24-06 at 01:09 +0200, Dr.Ruud wrote: > "Omega -1911" schreef: > > > while( ){ > >chomp; > >push @past_bids, $_; # push remaining lines into array > >} > > That is (almost) the same as > > chomp( @past_bids = ) ; > > > Why do you

Re: Netiquette

2006-06-23 Thread Dr.Ruud
"Omega -1911" schreef: > while( ){ >chomp; >push @past_bids, $_; # push remaining lines into array >} That is (almost) the same as chomp( @past_bids = ) ; Why do you insist on slurping the remaining lines in an array? If the file is 900 MB (

Re: Netiquette (WAS: reading a line at a time inefficient?)

2006-06-23 Thread Omega -1911
On 6/23/06, Mr. Shawn H. Corey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 2006-23-06 at 11:55 +, Jeff Peng wrote: > > > >Let's see, the subject is: reading a line at a time inefficient? > > > >That's where I got the idea. > > > > > No,the subject is "Re: reading a line at a time inefficient? ",he ha

Re: Netiquette (WAS: reading a line at a time inefficient?)

2006-06-23 Thread Mr. Shawn H. Corey
On Fri, 2006-23-06 at 11:55 +, Jeff Peng wrote: > > > >Let's see, the subject is: reading a line at a time inefficient? > > > >That's where I got the idea. > > > > > No,the subject is "Re: reading a line at a time inefficient? ",he has > followed the other's threads. > > > If you change th