Re: HTML::Tree help

2004-11-30 Thread Ing. Branislav Gerzo
Jonathan Paton [JP], on Tuesday, November 30, 2004 at 16:04 (+) thinks about: JP> As always, programmer time is more valuable than computer time. I have to agree, I now this. My office computer never stops count something (on idle time it counts mersenne prime number:) JP> Correctness is als

Re: HTML::Tree help

2004-11-30 Thread Ing. Branislav Gerzo
Randy W. Sims [RWS], on Tuesday, November 30, 2004 at 11:41 (-0500) wrote: first of all - thanks for reply, I thought, I didn't get one, because I have always specific problems, such this :) RWS> There are basically two types of parser: 1) the type that reads in html, RWS> xml, etc. and builds an

Re: HTML::Tree help

2004-11-30 Thread Randy W. Sims
Ing. Branislav Gerzo wrote: Hi all, I have to parse some thousand of html files, so I'd like to use some html parser, and not my own regexpes. Htmls I am parsing are quite complex, so I need your help. First of all, is HTML::Tree good and fast module? Because, I am not sure if I have to look for so

Re: HTML::Tree help

2004-11-30 Thread Jonathan Paton
As always, programmer time is more valuable than computer time. Correctness is also handy. Even if it takes you longer to learn a module than hack away, next time you encounter a similar problem you should be quicker. HTML::Tree is slow, it builds up a collection of objects representing the docu