Re: Getting options from the command line

2001-05-17 Thread Brett W. McCoy
> I am still very much the newbie, but to my untrained mind, > this completely blows away getopts. Getopt is a lot more flexible than the -s switch. I agree that -s is fine for basic stuff, but for more complicated command-line parsing (like switch bundling, or forcing a mandatory datatype), you

Re: Getting options from the command line

2001-05-17 Thread Bkwyrm
I don't know if this will help at all, but I just found out, myself, about the -s option. If you run your script with: #!/usr/bin/perl -s and remember, to keep strict happy, to: use vars qw($all_the $variables $you_need $from_stdin); You can run your script like this: bash-2.03$ script.pl -varia

Re: Getting options from the command line

2001-05-17 Thread Brett W. McCoy
On Thu, 17 May 2001, Craig Moynes/Markham/IBM wrote: > I tried using the getopts, and getopt but I can't seem to have mandatory > parameters with optional parameters. > I have something like this for my usage > perl scp_logs.pl -u username -h hostname -l local_directory [-r > remote_directory] S

Re: Getting options from the command line

2001-05-17 Thread Paul
--- Craig Moynes/Markham/IBM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I tried using the getopts, and getopt but I can't seem to have > mandatory parameters with optional parameters. > I have something like this for my usage > perl scp_logs.pl -u username -h hostname -l local_directory [-r > remote_directory]