Re: Fw: HTTP Requests

2002-12-28 Thread Wiggins d'Anconia
Interesting discussion, I was just trying, in a somewhat more civil manner than "RTFM", to merely point out that the original poster hadn't done his/her homework and used the help of looking in the docs that had already been offered. :-) http://danconia.org R. Joseph Newton wrote: HI Randal,

Re: Fw: HTTP Requests

2002-12-26 Thread R. Joseph Newton
HI Randal, Although not in the Perl culture, I have indeed seen a great deal of cargo cult thinking in my years, and I fully agree that such consciousness is a Very Bad Thing. On a quick skim of lwpcook, I would also tend to agree that this is a good source of first reference to those utilities

Re: Fw: HTTP Requests

2002-12-24 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
> "R" == R Joseph Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: R> Hi Randal, R> I must take issue with you here. And therefore, you misunderstood my purpose. You have not *seen* the amount of cargo-cult c**p that I've seen in advising people about Perl over 13 years. Maybe it's interesting to know ho

Re: Fw: HTTP Requests

2002-12-23 Thread R. Joseph Newton
Hi Randal, I must take issue with you here. Whatever the convenience of such utilities in a production environment, there is a definite advantage to the learning process in hand-coding. I learned something just from reading the example--that there was a specific MIME for httP posts. Whatever

Re: Fw: HTTP Requests

2002-12-22 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
> "Rob" == Rob Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Rob> It's not appropriate to correct anything but misleading advice. It's misleading to handcode application/x-www-form-urlencoded values when more proper higher-level functions are available, such as HTTP::Request::Common. I thought the URL w

Re: Fw: HTTP Requests

2002-12-21 Thread Wiggins d'Anconia
Randal L. Schwartz wrote: "Wiggins" == Wiggins D'Anconia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Wiggins> Right. And that is what the LWP module is for. From the docs on the Wiggins> first URL I posted earlier: Wiggins># Create a request Wiggins>my $req = HTTP::Request->new(POST => Wiggins> 'http

Re: Fw: HTTP Requests

2002-12-21 Thread Rob Dixon
Randal There's nothing wrong with Wiggins' advice. Take a look at "the first URL [he] posted earlier" and you'll find nothing about the HTTP::Request::Common module at all. In fact I can't find anywhere it tells you not to use the constructor directly - the nearest I've come across is in the POD f

Re: Fw: HTTP Requests

2002-12-21 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
> "Wiggins" == Wiggins D'Anconia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Wiggins> Right. And that is what the LWP module is for. From the docs on the Wiggins> first URL I posted earlier: Wiggins># Create a request Wiggins>my $req = HTTP::Request->new(POST => Wiggins> 'http://www.perl.com/cgi-bin/

Re: Fw: HTTP Requests

2002-12-21 Thread Wiggins d'Anconia
Right. And that is what the LWP module is for. From the docs on the first URL I posted earlier: An Example This example shows how the user agent, a request and a response are represented in actual perl code: # Create a user agent object use LWP::UserAgent; $ua = LWP::UserAgent->new; $