Re: File::Basename, linux, and extensions

2002-01-12 Thread Michael Fowler
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 07:16:29AM -0500, zentara wrote: > I've been playing with File::Basename and > the docs are not absolutely clear on whether > you can get an extension on a linux system. > I have had no success trying, so does this mean > that linux is not capable of dealing with extensions

Re: File::Basename, linux, and extensions

2002-01-11 Thread Sudarsan Raghavan
zentara wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 04:39:05 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John W. Krahn) wrote: > > >Zentara wrote: > > > >> I've been playing with File::Basename and > >> the docs are not absolutely clear on whether > >> you can get an extension on a linux system. > >> I have had no success trying

Re: File::Basename, linux, and extensions

2002-01-11 Thread zentara
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 04:39:05 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John W. Krahn) wrote: >Zentara wrote: > >> I've been playing with File::Basename and >> the docs are not absolutely clear on whether >> you can get an extension on a linux system. >> I have had no success trying, so does this mean >> that lin

Re: File::Basename, linux, and extensions

2002-01-11 Thread John W. Krahn
Zentara wrote: > > Hi, Hello, > I've been playing with File::Basename and > the docs are not absolutely clear on whether > you can get an extension on a linux system. > I have had no success trying, so does this mean > that linux is not capable of dealing with extensions? > > As an example fro