"Paul Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Thanks a lot! This is just what I was looking for in your first example.
> (The second example won't do me as much good, as I need to consider
> characters that haven't changed inside of a string of characters that
> have-
Thanks a lot! This is just what I was looking for in your first example.
(The second example won't do me as much good, as I need to consider
characters that haven't changed inside of a string of characters that
have--but it's still a good reference.)
Thanks again,
paul
10:11am, Rob Anderson wro
Hi Paul
"Rob Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Paul Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> [snip]
>
> >
> > If anyone can offer general improvements to that approach, that'd be
> > great--but what I'm really interested in
"Paul Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[snip]
>
> If anyone can offer general improvements to that approach, that'd be
> great--but what I'm really interested in is finding the first element that
> differs, and maybe the last as well. If there were any easy way
