Re: -w and warnings.pm

2003-03-25 Thread Rob Dixon
Rob Anderson wrote: > Dan, > > One thing that springs to mind is that if you're using Windows, you > can't specify -w on a she-bang (well you can, but windows aint gonna > do anything with it). Using warnings.pm would force this in the > script, rather than relying on you webserver, whatever's call

Re: -w and warnings.pm

2003-03-25 Thread Rob Anderson
Dan, One thing that springs to mind is that if you're using Windows, you can't specify -w on a she-bang (well you can, but windows aint gonna do anything with it). Using warnings.pm would force this in the script, rather than relying on you webserver, whatever's calling you scripts. Hope this hel

RE: -w and warnings.pm

2003-03-24 Thread Jenda Krynicky
From: "Dan Muey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Ok, let me simplify the question. > > Does the #!perl -w switch still work on Perl 5.6.0 and later? Yes. No need to worry. Jenda = [EMAIL PROTECTED] === http://Jenda.Krynicky.cz = When it comes to wine, women and song, wizards are allowed to get dr

RE: -w and warnings.pm

2003-03-24 Thread Dan Muey
> From: "Dan Muey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Ok, let me simplify the question. > > > > Does the #!perl -w switch still work on Perl 5.6.0 and later? > > Yes. No need to worry. Thanks for the peace of mind! > > Jenda > = [EMAIL PROTECTED] === http://Jenda.Krynicky.cz = > When it comes to

RE: -w and warnings.pm

2003-03-24 Thread Dan Muey
Ok, let me simplify the question. Does the #!perl -w switch still work on Perl 5.6.0 and later? Thanks, Dan > Hello list, > > If I understand this right -w and warnings.pm do the same > thing except :: > > - warnings.pm is new to Perl 5.6.0 > - -w applies to the entire program and