On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, at 08:28 AM, Maurice O'Prey wrote:
How do I extract a whole number from the rand function.
int() is your friend, if you want an integer from rand.
I am using rand 25000; which generates a random number with many
decimal
places, e.g. 16235.2587965, I need a wh
int(rand 25000)
Dylan
-Original Message-
From: Maurice O'Prey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: January 15, 2003 10:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Random Number Generation
Hi All
How do I extract a whole number from the rand function.
I am using rand 25000; which genera
> -Original Message-
> From: Maurice O'Prey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 9:28 AM
> Hi All
>
> How do I extract a whole number from the rand function.
>
> I am using rand 25000; which generates a random number with
> many decimal
> places, e.g. 16235.258
Hi All
How do I extract a whole number from the rand function.
I am using rand 25000; which generates a random number with many decimal
places, e.g. 16235.2587965, I need a whole number as the answer. Sorry if
this is simple...
Regards
Maurice
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fo
$num=(int(rand 35));
There is probably a more random way to do it, but this is what i know...
-Original Message-
From: Mark Rowlands [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 2:59 AM
To: .; Beginners (E-mail)
Subject: Re: Random Number Generation
On Saturday 04 August
On Saturday 04 August 2001 18:35, . wrote:
> Another thing that I notice the llama book fails to mention is random
> number generation. Is this possible in Perl? (More specifically in a CGI
> script.)
could also look at Math::TrulyRandom or Math::Random
--
To unsubscribe, e-mai
Thanks for the info.
Aziz,,,
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "smoot"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Abdulaziz Ghuloum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>> Doesn't /dev/random produce pseudo-random numbers also? What makes
>> reading from it better than using perl's rand or C's rand?
>
> This is g
On Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 07:31:45AM -1000, . wrote:
> > Before 5.004 you did need to seed the PRNG, but I'm not convinced that
> > time|$$ was ever a really good choice. Good enough for most purposes
> > though, if called only once.
>
> But why only once? That's the part that confusses me.
I t
> "Abdulaziz Ghuloum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Doesn't /dev/random produce pseudo-random numbers also? What makes
> reading from it better than using perl's rand or C's rand?
This is getting a bit of topic.
/dev/random is seeded with supposedly random events. In Linux I believe it
takes t
> said:
>
>> Another thing that I notice the llama book fails to mention is random
>> number generation. Is this possible in Perl? (More specifically in a
>> CGI script.)
>
> The rand() function will generate pseudo random numbers. If you need
> better random nu
"." wrote:
>
> Are you sure it's the llama book, not the camel? Either way, blue or pink?
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mike Rodgers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2001
11 matches
Mail list logo