[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> well i really need a server :-)
> thanks,
> KM
Hi K.
I really think you ought to come clean on what you're actually
trying to do to give Wiggins (and the rest of us) a sporting chance
of helping you :)
The bottom line is that you can write a daemon in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
well i really need a server :-)
thanks,
KM
Still confused as to why, but ok...
How will your clients be connecting to the server? I would suggest
having a look at:
perldoc -f fork
perldoc -f
Hi all,
well i really need a server :-)
thanks,
KM
On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, Wiggins d'Anconia wrote:
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > well to make it clear -- i need to make a server -- a constantly running
> > process --
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
well to make it clear -- i need to make a server -- a constantly running
process --
suppose if i want to get a daily report of the frequency of all the users
logging in and out on the system from the daemon written in perl -- how do i do that ?
thanks,
KM
You
Hi,
well to make it clear -- i need to make a server -- a constantly running
process --
suppose if i want to get a daily report of the frequency of all the users
logging in and out on the system from the daemon written in perl -- how do i do that ?
thanks,
KM
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi all,
how to write daemons in perl ?
does it have such a support ? if so which module should i use?
kindly enlighten me --
thanks in advance --
First question, do you want a "daemon" as in a process that is started,
then exec's a new process without a controlling te
There are some modules
from CPAN (http://search.cpan.org/) you can use.
I would suggest:
1. Net::Daemon
http://search.cpan.org/author/JWIED/Net-Daemon-0.37/lib/Net/Daemon.pm
2. give a look to Net::Server as well, for general purpose.
http://search.cpan.org/author/RHANDOM/Net-Server-0.84/lib/Net
On Wed, 2002-04-17 at 15:24, drieux wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, April 17, 2002, at 11:55 , Chas Owens wrote:
> [..]
> > Oopsy, forgot the sleep call. That is what I get for just posting code
> > without testing it first. Well, I did say something like this > />. Maybe it should look more like th
