Re: Using References in Modules within threads

2010-04-08 Thread Rene Schickbauer
Steve Bertrand wrote: Hi! Well, working on windows does have its benefits. When something goes horribly wrong, you can always point the finger to Redmont and your users will believe you (not matter who's fault it really is)... I can tell you work in an Enterprise environment already ;) Yeah

Re: Using References in Modules within threads

2010-04-07 Thread Steve Bertrand
On 2010.04.07 19:19, Rene Schickbauer wrote: > Shawn H Corey wrote: >> Rene Schickbauer wrote: >>> Shawn H Corey wrote: >>> Personally, I don't see why anyone would want to run Windows. It's like trying to run a marathon while dragging a bus. >>> >>> For me, its mainly because it pays th

Re: Using References in Modules within threads

2010-04-07 Thread Rene Schickbauer
Shawn H Corey wrote: Rene Schickbauer wrote: Shawn H Corey wrote: Personally, I don't see why anyone would want to run Windows. It's like trying to run a marathon while dragging a bus. For me, its mainly because it pays the rent. I did say, "want to" not "have to" :) Well, working on w

RE: Using References in Modules within threads

2010-04-07 Thread Bob McConnell
From: Shawn H Corey >Shlomi Fish wrote: >> Nevertheless, if you are going to run Perl on UNIX systems exclusively, you >> shouldn't use threads. And if you're planning to do such multi-tasking on >> Windows using Perl - please reconsider. > > Personally, I don't see why anyone would want to run

Re: Using References in Modules within threads

2010-04-07 Thread Shawn H Corey
Rene Schickbauer wrote: Shawn H Corey wrote: Personally, I don't see why anyone would want to run Windows. It's like trying to run a marathon while dragging a bus. For me, its mainly because it pays the rent. I did say, "want to" not "have to" :) -- Just my 0.0002 million dollars wo

Re: Using References in Modules within threads

2010-04-07 Thread Rene Schickbauer
Shawn H Corey wrote: Personally, I don't see why anyone would want to run Windows. It's like trying to run a marathon while dragging a bus. For me, its mainly because it pays the rent. You know, girls sell their body, boys sell their soul. Or something like that. LG Rene -- To unsubscrib

Re: Using References in Modules within threads

2010-04-07 Thread Shawn H Corey
Shlomi Fish wrote: Nevertheless, if you are going to run Perl on UNIX systems exclusively, you shouldn't use threads. And if you're planning to do such multi-tasking on Windows using Perl - please reconsider. Personally, I don't see why anyone would want to run Windows. It's like trying to r

Re: Using References in Modules within threads

2010-04-07 Thread Shlomi Fish
Hi Shawn, On Wednesday 07 Apr 2010 16:05:24 Shawn H Corey wrote: > Shlomi Fish wrote: > > I would really recommend against using threads: > > > > * http://perldoc.perl.org/perlthrtut.html > > > > * http://www.perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=288022 > > > > They don't work as expected in Perl (tho

Re: Using References in Modules within threads

2010-04-07 Thread Shawn H Corey
Shlomi Fish wrote: I would really recommend against using threads: * http://perldoc.perl.org/perlthrtut.html * http://www.perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=288022 They don't work as expected in Perl (though in C/C++, .NET and/or Java, they may be an option[Thr]), and cause too many problems. If

Re: Using References in Modules within threads

2010-04-07 Thread Shlomi Fish
Hi, On Wednesday 07 Apr 2010 14:59:08 Frenzel, Joerg (ext) wrote: > Hello, > > I need help by using threads in combination with external packages > (modules). I would really recommend against using threads: * http://perldoc.perl.org/perlthrtut.html * http://www.perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=2