RE: RFC for the three levels of beginnerNeff

2002-05-22 Thread David Gray
> { my other OCD is formalization of systems } Just because of you, drieux, I have a new appreciation for my bookmarklets that send me racing off across the web in search of these new and intriguing acronyms and words that

Re: RFC for the three levels of beginnerNeff

2002-05-22 Thread drieux
On Wednesday, May 22, 2002, at 10:13 , David T-G wrote: [..] > > > HAND > > :-D on behalf of the 'normal wing' of the Orthodox perl community I would like to apologize to most of the first two classes of perlPerkin... but, well THEY are like that. Do YOU really want to use perl;

Re: RFC for the three levels of beginnerNeff

2002-05-22 Thread David T-G
Chas, et al -- ...and then Chas Owens said... % ... % > in the loo and code at the same time % % % This is what laptops are for (no, I am not joking). Wireless NICs, too; it was way too annoying to have to unplug, relocate, and plug into the 'net jack in the can (no, I'm not, either!)

Re: RFC for the three levels of beginnerNeff

2002-05-22 Thread Chas Owens
> most likely will finally break down and own a copy of > the pocket reference guide to programming perl because > their dog eared copy of the first edition is starting > to show signs of age, and it's hard to read the 3rd edition > in the loo and code at the same t

RE: RFC for the three levels of beginnerNeff

2002-05-22 Thread Nikola Janceski
why not rename them to "Know nothing", "Know something", "Know most things", "use Perl;" respectively? maybe I should change my sig to say: Nikola Janceski "Know most things" && $< == 0; > -Original Message- > From: drieux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 12:28