RE: Mod_Perl2 CGI.pm

2003-08-29 Thread K Old
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 13:54, Paul Kraus wrote: > That is how I built it. Apache 2 Mod_Perl2 and the current release of > mason as of this morning. > > My question is do I need to learn cgi.pm, should I not bother and get a > book on mod_perl because the info is redundant or not needed with > mod_p

RE: Mod_Perl2 CGI.pm

2003-08-29 Thread Paul Kraus
. Paul Kraus -Original Message- From: K Old [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 1:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Mod_Perl2 CGI.pm On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 13:43, Paul Kraus wrote: > Is mod_perl a replacement for CGI? > > If jus

RE: Mod_Perl2 CGI.pm

2003-08-29 Thread perl
Mason, by default, uses mod_perl. (If you're using a handler, your using mod_perl). Mason _can_ run under CGI (or without a web server) but you have to intentionally deviate from the standard installation to do this. -Original Message- From: Paul Kraus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Frid

Re: Mod_Perl2 CGI.pm

2003-08-29 Thread K Old
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 13:43, Paul Kraus wrote: > Is mod_perl a replacement for CGI? > > If just getting involved with perl and the web (Not new to perl) what is > the better option mod_perl or cgi? > This is on an apache server. > > I choose mason thinking it was a replacement for both I know see