On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:33, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>> ""Chas" == "Chas Owens" writes:
>
> "Chas> Neither license prevents people from selling the software in question,
> "Chas> but both require that source be available (or made available), so
> "Chas> anyone charging an arm and a leg for
> ""Chas" == "Chas Owens" writes:
"Chas> Neither license prevents people from selling the software in question,
"Chas> but both require that source be available (or made available), so
"Chas> anyone charging an arm and a leg for it will rapidly find free
"Chas> versions being made available (
From: Steve Bertrand
> Chas. Owens wrote:
>> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 22:04, Steve Bertrand
wrote:
>> snip
>>> I like the BSD license, and I am a BSD person, but I'm asking for
>>> feedback from the creme-de-la-creme with regards to making code
public,
>>> so that I can put something in my code to e
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 00:51, Steve Bertrand wrote:
snip
> I wish all of my code be free, ie: I don't care if a commercial entity
> uses it for their benefit or not, I don't care if derivatives are used
> in commercial products or not, all I really care about is that my
> current code is protected
Chas. Owens wrote:
> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 22:04, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> snip
>> I like the BSD license, and I am a BSD person, but I'm asking for
>> feedback from the creme-de-la-creme with regards to making code public,
>> so that I can put something in my code to ensure that someone else
>> d
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 22:04, Steve Bertrand wrote:
snip
> I like the BSD license, and I am a BSD person, but I'm asking for
> feedback from the creme-de-la-creme with regards to making code public,
> so that I can put something in my code to ensure that someone else
> doesn't decide that they wan
