It really just depends on the purpose of the application. If you need to do
memory intensive tasks an individual machine app would be best. If you are
doing anything else, I would go with web based applications..
Just my 2 cents...
Steve
"Todd Wade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:
Nyimi Jose wrote:
>> The Browser's interface cannot contain all the features and rings
>> and bells a normal GUI can (unless you use Java and use the browser
>> just to download and host the application)
>
> What about Perl for the aforementioned functionality.
> It's seems that Java is the Guru
On Wednesday, October 9, 2002, at 07:08 AM, Jenda Krynicky wrote:
> Yeah ... "Browser Client" applications tend to take longer to do
> anything in.
Of course, this can be as much a fault of bad interface design as the
medium.
> The interface cannot contain all the features and rings
> and bel
On Wednesday, October 9, 2002, at 05:28 AM, NYIMI Jose (BMB) wrote:
> Do you have some reasons in which case "Distributed GUI" will be the
> winner against "Browser Client" ?
Sure, tons. Neither Photoshop nor Warcraft III are going to see a HTML
interface in their next revision. Don't get m
From: "NYIMI Jose (BMB)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > The Browser's interface cannot contain all the features and rings
> > and bells a normal GUI can (unless you use Java and use the browser
> > just to download and host the application)
>
> What about Perl for the aforementioned functionality.
> It's
> The Browser's interface cannot contain all the features and rings
> and bells a normal GUI can (unless you use Java and use the browser
> just to download and host the application)
What about Perl for the aforementioned functionality.
It's seems that Java is the Guru in GUI matters ? :(
José
From: "NYIMI Jose (BMB)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > my 2 cents...
> >
> > Distributed GUI apps are legacy. Write web based software.
>
> You right !
> That's what I was thinking about ...
>
> Do you have some reasons in which case "Distributed GUI" will be the
> winner against "Browser Client" ?
> my 2 cents...
>
> Distributed GUI apps are legacy. Write web based software.
You right !
That's what I was thinking about ...
Do you have some reasons in which case "Distributed GUI" will be the winner against
"Browser Client" ?
Should I continue learning Perl/Tk then ? :-)
José.
D
Nyimi Jose wrote:
> Hello,
>
Hi there!
>
> My question is:
> Once I develop my Application(GUIs) and so one, how to deploy it to users
> ? If my users are using PC (Windows OS) and they don't Perl installed on
> their PC, - should I go and installed Perl on each user's PC : I don't
> think that
Check out ActiveState's PerlApp that comes with their Perl Dev Kit. It does
a very good job of packaging your Perl scripts in a compressed executable
that will extract and then run the script without Perl having to be
installed on the target machine.
There is also a product called perl2exe whic
10 matches
Mail list logo