On Friday, Sep 20, 2002, at 05:50 US/Pacific, Cricker wrote:
[..]
> So what I was thinking of doing was something like:
>
> my ($a,$b);
>
> # main code
> ...
>
> #include "subs1.pl"
> ...
>
> where code in subs1.pl made reference to $a and $b. I realize that I
> can do
> this with globals. So
Yes, I think I'm clear on this; at least I hope so after banging my head
against Programming Perl 3. Globals are dynamically-scoped whereis lexicals
only exist in the file where they are declared with my. Page 57 says:
"Because the file is the largest possible lexical scope, a lexically-scoped
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 10:33:05AM -, Cricker wrote:
> If I may summarize -- and please correct me if this is wrong -- there is
> indeed no way to textually include one file inside another, like #include
> in C.
As I mentioned previously in this thread, C is able to share its variables
betwee
On Thursday, Sep 19, 2002, at 03:33 US/Pacific, Cricker wrote:
[..]
> Thank you very much for your clear explanation. I am indeed in this
> for the
> long haul, so will accept your advice to spend the extra time now and
> write
> modules. I had actually settled on the last approach you mention
Drieux and the others who took the time to answer me:
Thank you very much for your clear explanation. I am indeed in this for the
long haul, so will accept your advice to spend the extra time now and write
modules. I had actually settled on the last approach you mention, but now I
see its limita
you can try out : use, require and eval
--- Cricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
This seems like a stupid question... but I've looked
> in lots of places and
> can't figure it out.
>
> I'd like to break my perl script into several files
> (because it is getting
> awfully large, with all the cal
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 12:12:34PM -, Cricker wrote:
> Thanks, but I thought that modules were for submitting to CPAN. Don't I
> have to go through all the @ISA and Exporter:: stuff if I write a module? I
> would like to get away with something simpler.
Modules are for splitting code into m
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 06:25:42PM -, Cricker wrote:
> I'd like to break my perl script into several files (because it is getting
> awfully large, with all the callbacks from Tk), but still keep the lexical
> scope. Maybe I'm thinking too much like a C programmer, but I would just
> like to #
You don't need to write anything as a module per se. You can write a library
instead, which merely contains the vars, subs and the like that you re-use
often. Name it with a .pl extenstion. Then all you have to do is
require "/path/libname.pl";
at the start of your code.
--
To unsubscr
i have a source code for a bot which is extremely huge. i split it up into
several files, i.e:
source1.pl
source2.pl
source3.pl
etc..
and in the main executable file..
require("source1.pl");
require("source2.pl");
require("source3.pl");
then run the main executable file, and it'll load each other
On Wednesday, Sep 18, 2002, at 05:12 US/Pacific, Cricker wrote:
> Thanks, but I thought that modules were for submitting to CPAN.
a reasonable approach, in the long run, since you will find it
easier to install for both yourself and everyone else, IF you
build them in a way that is CPAN 'ready'
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Cricker wrote:
> Thanks, but I thought that modules were for submitting to CPAN.
No you can write modules for your own use too.
> Don't I
> have to go through all the @ISA and Exporter:: stuff if I write a module? I
> would like to get away with something simpler.
That'
You can obviously write your own package files
you must seriously consider 'perldoc perlmod'
Cricker wrote:
> Thanks, but I thought that modules were for submitting to CPAN. Don't I
> have to go through all the @ISA and Exporter:: stuff if I write a module? I
> would like to get away with s
Thanks, but I thought that modules were for submitting to CPAN. Don't I
have to go through all the @ISA and Exporter:: stuff if I write a module? I
would like to get away with something simpler.
Thanks again.
"Sudarshan Raghavan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EM
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Cricker wrote:
> This seems like a stupid question... but I've looked in lots of places and
> can't figure it out.
>
> I'd like to break my perl script into several files (because it is getting
> awfully large, with all the callbacks from Tk), but still keep the lexical
> sc
15 matches
Mail list logo
