Re: Beyond Book Learning - the problem of Re: array numerical name...

2002-04-30 Thread drieux
On Tuesday, April 30, 2002, at 11:34 , David Gray wrote: [..] >> given the quandery: >> >>> basically i want to name an array with a subscript ie >>> world0[0] and world1[0] the 0/1 being a variable, i have tried to >>> produce a simple example >> >> why take the convolutions??? > >

RE: Beyond Book Learning - the problem of Re: array numerical name...

2002-04-30 Thread Chas Owens
On Tue, 2002-04-30 at 16:45, Timothy Johnson wrote: > > > "I also find that it's only more confusing to be sesquipedalian in response > to posts that only > need a simple, clear answer." > > Sesquipedalian is a pretty big word. :) > Come on now, we need to eschew obfuscation. -- Today is S

RE: Beyond Book Learning - the problem of Re: array numerical name...

2002-04-30 Thread Timothy Johnson
"I also find that it's only more confusing to be sesquipedalian in response to posts that only need a simple, clear answer." Sesquipedalian is a pretty big word. :) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Beyond Book Learning - the problem of Re: array numerical name...

2002-04-30 Thread David Gray
> On Tuesday, April 30, 2002, at 07:32 , David Gray wrote: > [..] > > my $fred = 'one,two,three,four'; > > my $a = 0; > > @{"array$a"} = split ',', $fred; > > > > for(0..3) { > > print ${"array$a"}[$b] > > } > > File "untitled text 2"; Line 21: Name "main::b" used only > once: possible > typo