Is it possible these days to write perl code and then turn it in
to C++ that one could then put in to a C++ program?
I am writing a c++ program that will deal with PCM audio
and alsa sound functions which are good at managing sound cards
so that one can get a stream of binary audio from
e passwords, api keys, etc) in your code, then you have a
> > fundamental design issue that needs to be fixed.
> >
>
>
>
> Decompiling C/C++/asm code in a form that can be re-compiled again is hard
> to do for most programmers.
> Finding/unhiding the provided P
ost programmers.
Finding/unhiding the provided Perl code is not as hard.
So the real answer is that if the protection of the source code is so
important, then Perl is not an appropriate programming language for this,
because it doesn't have a way of compiling the code and storing it in files
tha
>
>
> On 1/11/2019 6:57 AM, Andrew Solomon wrote:
>
> Just a warning - I'm no expert on this topic, but it was such an interesting
> question I decided to find out for myself :-)
>
> I installed B::C and ran
> https://metacpan.org/pod/distribution/B-C/script/perlc
uld Acme::Bleach do the trick? Or something
>> similar?
>>
>> :)
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019, 5:01 AM Uday Vernekar >>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have a perl code which I need to covert to binary so that nobody can see
>>> the code.
>>>
>
t; I installed B::C and ran https://metacpan.org/pod/distribution/B-C/script/
> perlcc.PL
>
> It actually does the compilation - as opposed to pp which is just
> packaging it - so you don't see the perl code of the source file.
>
> Does that resolve your question?
>
> Andr
uot;nobody"? Would Acme::Bleach do the trick? Or something
> similar?
>
> :)
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019, 5:01 AM Uday Vernekar
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have a perl code which I need to covert to binary so that nobody can
>> see the code.
>>
>> we use
/script/perlcc.PL
It actually does the compilation - as opposed to pp which is just
packaging it - so you don't see the perl code of the source file.
Does that resolve your question?
Andrew
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 9:59 AM Uday Vernekar
mailto:vernekaru...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Thanks. On Windows I did 'cpan install B::C'
and it went on and on with many test fails.
After about 3 minutes it threw a 'Perl interpreter
has stopped working' error (details below) and when
I closed that box it continued with the test fails
for another 3+ minutes and then stopped (it was proba
alled B::C and ran
https://metacpan.org/pod/distribution/B-C/script/perlcc.PL
It actually does the compilation - as opposed to pp which is just
packaging it - so you don't see the perl code of the source file.
Does that resolve your question?
Andrew
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 9:59 A
pe perlcc -o hello.exe hello.pl?
>
> Does all this work on Windows? My guess is Yes.
>
>
> Mike
>
>
> On 1/11/2019 6:57 AM, Andrew Solomon wrote:
>
> Just a warning - I'm no expert on this topic, but it was such an
> interesting question I decided to find out fo
nteresting question I decided to find out for myself :-)
I installed B::C and ran
https://metacpan.org/pod/distribution/B-C/script/perlcc.PL
It actually does the compilation - as opposed to pp which is just
packaging it - so you don't see the perl code of the source file.
Does th
How dumb is your "nobody"? Would Acme::Bleach do the trick? Or something
similar?
:)
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019, 5:01 AM Uday Vernekar Hi all,
>
> I have a perl code which I need to covert to binary so that nobody can see
> the code.
>
> we used pp package to make the perl
o you don't see the perl code of the source file.
Does that resolve your question?
Andrew
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 9:59 AM Uday Vernekar
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a perl code which I need to covert to binary so that nobody can see
> the code.
>
> we used pp package to m
Hi Uday,
On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 15:29:23 +0530
Uday Vernekar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a perl code which I need to covert to binary so that nobody can see
> the code.
>
> we used pp package to make the perl code binary but here the user can see
> the code which gets crea
Hi all,
I have a perl code which I need to covert to binary so that nobody can see
the code.
we used pp package to make the perl code binary but here the user can see
the code which gets created in tmp.
Need help if anybody knows kindly reply
With regards
Uday V G
Hi Gurunath,
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:38:48 +0530
Gurunath Katagi wrote:
> Dear all,
> I want to write a program for geometric hashing in perl. Does anyone know,
> if this is a part of any perl module or someone has written the code
> sometime...
>
This search does not find anything:
https://met
Dear all,
I want to write a program for geometric hashing in perl. Does anyone know,
if this is a part of any perl module or someone has written the code
sometime...
The algorithm for the geometric hashing is provided in this paper :
http://graphics.stanford.edu/courses/cs468-01-winter/papers/wr-g
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 07:20:55PM GMT, Bill Stephenson wrote:
> Thank you for the info Raf. I had no idea the client (or the list) was
> doing that.
No worries.
Most people don't know what email headers are, let alone what their
function is.
> I was being lazy...
Aren't we all at times ;^)
>
On Feb 22, 2013, at 3:59 AM, rjc wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> This is a kind request directed to you but also to everyone else to
> consider starting a new thread with a new message sent to the mailing
> list rather than replying to a previous email and changing the Subject:
> line.
>
> The rationale b
Hi Bill,
This is a kind request directed to you but also to everyone else to
consider starting a new thread with a new message sent to the mailing
list rather than replying to a previous email and changing the Subject:
line.
The rationale behind it is the fact that many email clients but also
mai
On Feb 20, 2013, at 6:02 PM, Bill Stephenson wrote:
> The "obfuscating code" thread touch on the larger point of selling an app
> written in perl. I'd like to discuss that a bit because I have some thoughts
> and questions.
Putting on my List Mom hat, I have to say that this is off topic for
The "obfuscating code" thread touch on the larger point of selling an app
written in perl. I'd like to discuss that a bit because I have some thoughts
and questions.
I don't really mind if someone buys my app code and then customizes it for
their purposes. That's actually a great thing for the
On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 18:19:32 -0400 , shawn wilson wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Jenda Krynicky wrote:
>
> > Actually ... what percentage of websites doing email address
> > validation in their forms do you think validate according to the RFC?
> > 0.001%?
> >
>
> i've never seen an
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Jenda Krynicky wrote:
> Actually ... what percentage of websites doing email address
> validation in their forms do you think validate according to the RFC?
> 0.001%?
>
i've never seen anyone do it correct in production.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: beginners-unsu
From: Chris Nehren
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 09:59:22 -0700 , John SJ Anderson wrote:
> > On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Ashwin Rao T wrote:
> > > 1)Check if IP address is in the range 172.125.1.0 and 172.125.25.0 using
> > > only
> > > return functions & regular expressions in Perl.
>
On 2012-08-29 18:46, Ashwin Rao T wrote:
3)Check if email address is valid using only return functions and regular
expressions in Perl.
It has been tried:
http://www.regular-expressions.info/email.html
http://ex-parrot.com/~pdw/Mail-RFC822-Address.html
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/201
On Sat, 01 Sep 2012 04:05:31 +, Peter Scott wrote:
> On 2012-08-29, at 12:46 PM, Ashwin Rao T wrote:
>> 1)Check if IP address is in the range 172.125.1.0 and 172.125.25.0
>> using only return functions & regular expressions in Perl.
>
> /\b172\.125\.(\d+)\.((?>\d+))(??{(1<=$1 && $1<=24 && 0<
On 2012-08-29, at 12:46 PM, Ashwin Rao T wrote:
> 1)Check if IP address is in the range 172.125.1.0 and 172.125.25.0
> using only return functions & regular expressions in Perl.
/\b172\.125\.(\d+)\.((?>\d+))(??{(1<=$1 && $1<=24 && 0<=$2 && $2<=255)||
($1==25 && $2==0) ? "" : "(*FAIL)"})/ and say
of course it's homework. though if the student would be so kind to
inform the list what the class's (and instructor's) best answer is to
#3, i'll be able to inform them whether the class is worth staying in.
seriously, it's a much harder question than it seems.
also, the cool way of answering #1 w
I smell homework:p
Paul Anderson -- VE3HOP
On 2012-08-29, at 12:46 PM, Ashwin Rao T wrote:
> 1)Check if IP address is in the range 172.125.1.0 and 172.125.25.0 using only
> return functions & regular expressions in Perl.
> 2)Check if the name is valid (has atleast 3 letters and one vo
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 09:59:22 -0700 , John SJ Anderson wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Ashwin Rao T wrote:
> > 1)Check if IP address is in the range 172.125.1.0 and 172.125.25.0 using
> > only
> > return functions & regular expressions in Perl.
> > 2)Check if the name is va
On Aug 29, 2012, at 11:59 AM, John SJ Anderson wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Ashwin Rao T wrote:
>> 1)Check if IP address is in the range 172.125.1.0 and 172.125.25.0 using only
>> return functions & regular expressions in Perl.
>> 2)Check if the name is valid (has atleast
At least one Scooby snack?
-Original Message-
From: Jim Gibson [mailto:jimsgib...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 12:59 PM
To: Perl Beginners
Subject: Re: Perl Code
On Aug 29, 2012, at 9:46 AM, Ashwin Rao T wrote:
> 1)Check if IP address is in the range 172.125.1.0
On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Ashwin Rao T wrote:
> 1)Check if IP address is in the range 172.125.1.0 and 172.125.25.0 using only
> return functions & regular expressions in Perl.
> 2)Check if the name is valid (has atleast 3 letters and one vowel) using only
> return functions and re
On Aug 29, 2012, at 9:46 AM, Ashwin Rao T wrote:
> 1)Check if IP address is in the range 172.125.1.0 and 172.125.25.0 using only
> return functions & regular expressions in Perl.
> 2)Check if the name is valid (has atleast 3 letters and one vowel) using only
> return functions and regular expres
1)Check if IP address is in the range 172.125.1.0 and 172.125.25.0 using only
return functions & regular expressions in Perl.
2)Check if the name is valid (has atleast 3 letters and one vowel) using only
return functions and regular expressions in Perl.
3)Check if email address is valid using only
On Sep 2, 4:46 am, ratul...@yahoo.co.in (anirban adhikary) wrote:
> Hi I have write the following code and Now I have been asked to write a unit
> test case for this code. But neither I have any idea how to write a unit
> test case nor I have ever experience with it. So in this case I am asking
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 14:16:30 +0530, anirban adhikary wrote:
> Hi I have write the following code and Now I have been asked to write a
> unit test case for this code. But neither I have any idea how to write
> a unit test case nor I have ever experience with it. So in this case I
> am asking your
Hi I have write the following code and Now I have been asked to write a unit
test case for this code. But neither I have any idea how to write a unit test
case nor I have ever experience with it. So in this case I am asking your help.
#!/usr/bin/perl
###
## The program is called by main.pl
##
Emeka wrote:
Hello All,
Hello,
What is the purpose of colon here ?
sub pop : method {
my $self = shift;
my ($list) = $self->_prepare(@_);
pop @$list;
my $result = $list;
return $self->_finalize($result);
}
perldoc perlsub
SYNOPSIS
To declare subroutines:
Hello All,
What is the purpose of colon here ?
sub pop : method {
my $self = shift;
my ($list) = $self->_prepare(@_);
pop @$list;
my $result = $list;
return $self->_finalize($result);
}
Is this how to do function alias?
sub sortBy {&sort_by} #
sub sort_by {
my $self =
y.
uri
--
Uri Guttman -- uri AT perlhunter DOT com --- http://www.perlhunter.com --
Perl Developer Recruiting and Placement Services -
- Perl Code Review, Architecture, Development, Training, Support ---
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: beginners-unsubscr...@pe
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 02:33:19PM +0530, VinoRex.E wrote:
> Hi
> i am a beginner in Perl i have a pdb file containing the X,Y,and Z
> coordinates of atoms example given below. the data extends upto 1000 atoms
> and its coordinates. I need a perl program to export these data into excel
> worksheet
On Aug 4, 2011 8:02 AM, "Emeka" wrote:
>
> Vino,
>
> First learn how to use Excel with Perl. The below might be useful, please
> check them out.
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/214797
>
> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-pexcel/
>
That is (of course) a decent 'getting started
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Emeka wrote:
> Vino,
>
> First learn how to use Excel with Perl. The below might be useful, please
> check them out.
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/214797
>
> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-pexcel/
>
> Emeka
>
>
You can also learn here :
1)
Vino,
First learn how to use Excel with Perl. The below might be useful, please
check them out.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/214797
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-pexcel/
Emeka
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:03 AM, VinoRex.E wrote:
> Hi
> i am a beginner in Perl i have a pdb
Hi
i am a beginner in Perl i have a pdb file containing the X,Y,and Z
coordinates of atoms example given below. the data extends upto 1000 atoms
and its coordinates. I need a perl program to export these data into excel
worksheet into distinct columns and ROws.
ATOM 1 N GLY A 2 1.8
Anirban Adhikary wrote:
Hi list
Hello,
I have wirtten the following perl code which has some configuration
params such as prefix,suffix,midfix and nofix. The logic is filenames
will be selected based on prefix,suffix and midfix pattern.After the
fiter through above 3 patterns if file names
Hi Anirban,
a few comments on your code.
On Thursday 02 Jun 2011 08:06:54 Anirban Adhikary wrote:
> Hi list
>
> I have wirtten the following perl code which has some configuration
> params such as prefix,suffix,midfix and nofix. The logic is filenames
> will be selected based o
Hi list
I have wirtten the following perl code which has some configuration
params such as prefix,suffix,midfix and nofix. The logic is filenames
will be selected based on prefix,suffix and midfix pattern.After the
fiter through above 3 patterns if file names exists with nofix
patterns it will be
matched and so on.
yes, but only in scalar context does it do that. best to read the docs
(again and again) and learn the tricks of m// and s///. there are plenty
beyond the regexes themselves. perldoc perlretut is a good start.
uri
--
Uri Guttman -- u...@stemsystems.com ---- http:
ng itself. it just sets the starting
> point of the match. you can do a single match in scalar context without
> /g but it will not scan forward for the next time. this is what caused
> your infinite loop. /g is very useful in scalar context when used in a
> loop.
>
> uri
>
On Saturday 30 October 2010 01:42 PM, Uri Guttman wrote:
no. /g just makes the match START at the end of the last match. this
forces it to scan the string to the end so the LOOP will end. /g has
nothing to do with stopping anything itself. it just sets the starting
point of the match. you can
sed
your infinite loop. /g is very useful in scalar context when used in a
loop.
uri
--
Uri Guttman -- u...@stemsystems.com http://www.sysarch.com --
- Perl Code Review , Architecture, Development, Training, Support --
- Gourmet Hot Cocoa Mix http://bestf
On Saturday 30 October 2010 01:31 PM, ashwin ts wrote:
Hello Jathin,
The problem with the code is that its gone in to an infinite loop..
The pattern matching that u have done u need to make it global or for
all occurances.
..
The /g option is used to match all the patterns in the given string
On Saturday 30 October 2010 01:26 PM, Uri Guttman wrote:
but you missed the important point. the engine will stop but the next
time through the loop it will START at the beginning of the
string. hence the infinite loop.
[Jatin] Thanks Uri , This is a very important point that you have
men
Hello Jathin,
The problem with the code is that its gone in to an infinite loop..
The pattern matching that u have done u need to make it global or for all
occurances.
..
The /g option is used to match all the patterns in the given string
u can try this..
while ($catalog =~ /Perl/g)
Regards
Ashw
ain and carefully look for the context.
uri
--
Uri Guttman -- u...@stemsystems.com http://www.sysarch.com --
- Perl Code Review , Architecture, Development, Training, Support --
- Gourmet Hot Cocoa Mix http://bestfriendscocoa.com -
--
To unsubs
On Saturday 30 October 2010 01:11 PM, Uri Guttman wrote:
yes. infinite loop.
why did you remove the modifiers?
[Jatin] I read about the perl regexp engine. In one of the statement i
read that the engine stops matching once the pattern is found. so i had
removed the modifiers and test if the e
he
m/PATTERN/ section. if you don't understand what /g does from that, come
back here with more questions.
uri
--
Uri Guttman -- u...@stemsystems.com ---- http://www.sysarch.com --
- Perl Code Review , Architecture, Development, Training, Support --
- Gourm
Hi All
I had a sample code from the Perl&LWP book. It was the very first code i
was trying out in different ways. Firstly the actual code mentioned in
the book was as below:
--
#!/usr/bin/perl
use warnings;
use strict;
use LW
On Oct 25, 9:21 am, simssa...@gmail.com (saran) wrote:
> i am new to perl. please help me with this piece of code below.
> answer wat it prints is correct but the format has to adjusted...!
> program to convert Celsius to Fahrenheit
>
On 10/25/10 Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:21 AM, "saran"
scribbled:
> i am new to perl. please help me with this piece of code below.
> answer wat it prints is correct but the format has to adjusted...!
> program to convert Celsius to Fahrenheit
> **
Hi Saran,
overall, pretty good code.
On Monday 25 October 2010 18:21:31 saran wrote:
> i am new to perl. please help me with this piece of code below.
> answer wat it prints is correct but the format has to adjusted...!
> program to convert Celsius to Fahrenheit
>
Helo Saran,
The reason why it was printed in the next line is because u have no used
chomp function on $c.Chomp would remove unwanted new line characters.
I added chomp($c) to ur code and it works fine.. i mean as hw u wanted..
pls find the same code below with chomp..
i am new to perl. please help me with this piece of code below.
answer wat it prints is correct but the format has to adjusted...!
program to convert Celsius to Fahrenheit
**
#!/usr/bin/perl
use warnings;
use strict;
p
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 06:50:39PM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> Hi all,
> However, when I run "make test", the Perl code for print does not execute.
>
> I seem to be searching for the wrong problem in the usual places, so I'd
> like to ask for advice on the best
On 2010.04.16 11:32, Philip Potter wrote:
> On 16 April 2010 14:38, Steve Bertrand wrote:
>> This particular test:
> It sounds like your test isn't a test, it's a setup tool. Tests in
> projdir/t are there to test if the stuff in projdir/lib or
> projdir/blib works, and shouldn't be dependent on
On 16 April 2010 14:38, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> On 2010.04.16 09:15, Philip Potter wrote:
>> What are you *actually*
>> trying to do? What are you testing and why does this test require you
>> to print output to the user under "make test"?
>
> This particular test:
>
> - checks to see if an existi
ill pass if making changes to a function.
>>
>> What I want to be able to do, essentially, is allow Perl code to run
>> within small sections of tests while under "make test". In essence, some
>> pseudo code that I'd put into 999-update.t:
>>
>> #
I want to be able to do, essentially, is allow Perl code to run
> within small sections of tests while under "make test". In essence, some
> pseudo code that I'd put into 999-update.t:
>
> #test55
> perl on
> print result to STDOUT
> perl off # back to no print
PL
> make
> prove -bv t/22-upgrade.t
I use prove often, usually when I want to quickly and non-verbosely (-Q)
work with a single test file that I'm currently adding new tests to, or
to ensure existing tests still pass if making changes to a function.
What I want to be able to do, essentia
On 16 April 2010 02:05, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> On 2010.04.15 18:50, Steve Bertrand wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> In one of my projects, I've written a test file t/22-upgrade.t.
>
> [..snip..]
>
>> However, when I run "make test", the Perl code for pri
On 2010.04.15 18:50, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In one of my projects, I've written a test file t/22-upgrade.t.
[..snip..]
> However, when I run "make test", the Perl code for print does not execute.
Replying my own post, this project is currently only u
list of directives that have either been added or
deleted so the installer can perform manual intervention.
However, when I run "make test", the Perl code for print does not execute.
I seem to be searching for the wrong problem in the usual places, so I'd
like to ask for advic
Parag Kalra wrote on 03/16/2010 07:44:43 AM:
> Just couple of questions - How can I make my code readonly using Git
> such that it can be edited only when it is checked out.
The only thing that comes near to what you describe is a git repo created
with --bare. It's one that you can push to, and
Parag Kalra wrote:
Although it is not related to Perl directly and might be little strange
question but still thought of consulting Perl gurus.
Here is the thing - I mainly code in Perl and Bash and I don't use any SCM
tool. And the reason I don't use it is because even if I configure a SCM
ser
On Mar 16, 2010, at 7:44 AM, Parag Kalra wrote:
>
> Just couple of questions - How can I make my code readonly using Git such
> that it can be edited only when it is checked out.
If your code is 'readonly' then you cannot edit it. You cannot write to
something that is read only.
>
> Also if I
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 4:43 PM, David Christensen
wrote:
> Parag Kalra wrote:
>>
>> So wanted to know if it is a possible to use any free opensource tool to
>> manage code (only locally) where actual and current code resides in
>> different local directory and I can checkout code locally in some
On 16 March 2010 06:44, Parag Kalra wrote:
> Yes I have started using Git and I am very happy with it so far.
>
> Just couple of questions - How can I make my code readonly using Git such
> that it can be edited only when it is checked out.
I don't understand the question. If you have source fil
On 3/16/10, mohd sharif wrote:
> You can use "git"
>
> -Sharif
>
> On 3/14/10, Parag Kalra wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Although it is not related to Perl directly and might be little strange
>> question but still thought of consulting Perl gurus.
>>
>> Here is the thing - I mainly code in Perl and Ba
You can use "git"
-Sharif
On 3/14/10, Parag Kalra wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Although it is not related to Perl directly and might be little strange
> question but still thought of consulting Perl gurus.
>
> Here is the thing - I mainly code in Perl and Bash and I don't use any SCM
> tool. And the rea
Yes I have started using Git and I am very happy with it so far.
Just couple of questions - How can I make my code readonly using Git such
that it can be edited only when it is checked out.
Also if I want to take entire code base to particular revision, I guess I
need to use - 'git checkout '. S
Jeremiah Foster wrote on 03/15/2010 05:20:16
PM:
> Shlomi mentioned git early on in this thread.
You're right, sorry, I missed that one.
Eric
--
Eric MSP Veith
Hechtsheimer Str. 2
DE-55131 Mainz
Germany
IBM Deutschland GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Erich Clemen
On Mar 15, 2010, at 2:12 PM, Eric Veith1 wrote:
> Shlomi Fish wrote on 03/15/2010 08:33:30 AM:
>> Please don't recommend CVS for new development. There are much
>> superior and/or
>> open-source alternatives now. See:
>>
>> http://better-scm.berlios.de/
>
>
> I'm honestly curious why nobody
Shlomi Fish wrote on 03/15/2010 08:33:30 AM:
> Please don't recommend CVS for new development. There are much
> superior and/or
> open-source alternatives now. See:
>
> http://better-scm.berlios.de/
I'm honestly curious why nobody has explicitly suggested git so far. It is
not only pretty po
On Sunday 14 Mar 2010 22:43:44 David Christensen wrote:
> Parag Kalra wrote:
> > So wanted to know if it is a possible to use any free opensource tool to
> > manage code (only locally) where actual and current code resides in
> > different local directory and I can checkout code locally in some oth
On Monday 15 Mar 2010 08:21:22 Kenneth Wolcott wrote:
> Hi;
>
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 23:12, Dan Fish wrote:
> > You might want to have a look at Seapine Surround. It's not opensource,
> > but you can get a free single-user license and it's a very good SCM
> > program.
> >
> > It's also avai
Hi;
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 23:12, Dan Fish wrote:
> You might want to have a look at Seapine Surround. It's not opensource,
> but you can get a free single-user license and it's a very good SCM program.
> It's also available on a variety of platforms.
> http://www.seapine.com/scmlicensing.h
om: Parag Kalra [mailto:paragka...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2010 12:13 AM
To: Perl Beginners
Subject: Any Good SCM tool to manage Perl Code locally
Hi All,
Although it is not related to Perl directly and might be little strange
question but still thought of consulting Perl gurus.
Here i
Parag Kalra wrote:
So wanted to know if it is a possible to use any free opensource tool to
manage code (only locally) where actual and current code resides in
different local directory and I can checkout code locally in some other
directory (in my working directory)
CVS can do that; it has met
Hi Parag/Shlomi,
Shlomi Fish wrote:
Here is the thing - I mainly code in Perl and Bash and I don't use any SCM
tool. And the reason I don't use it is because even if I configure a SCM
server - I should be able to access it both from home and work place (which
is unlikely to happen)
Then what
On Sunday 14 Mar 2010 09:12:40 Parag Kalra wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Although it is not related to Perl directly and might be little strange
> question but still thought of consulting Perl gurus.
>
> Here is the thing - I mainly code in Perl and Bash and I don't use any SCM
> tool. And the reason I do
Hi All,
Although it is not related to Perl directly and might be little strange
question but still thought of consulting Perl gurus.
Here is the thing - I mainly code in Perl and Bash and I don't use any SCM
tool. And the reason I don't use it is because even if I configure a SCM
server - I shoul
ch longer
> than the processing time. If I can not run the perl file
> interactively, I will have to load the data file each time I run the
> processing code. However, I can interatively run perl code, I can load
> the data file once and run the processing code multiple times in orde
file
> interactively, I will have to load the data file each time I run the
> processing code. However, I can interatively run perl code, I can load
> the data file once and run the processing code multiple times in order
> to debug the processing code.
For debugging an existing prog
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Gabor Szabo wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Peng Yu wrote:
>
>> In a 'perl -d', I try the following command, but it seems that it is
>> not working as I expected. Can I input any arbitrary perl commands in
>> the 'perl -d' session as if it is running by
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Peng Yu wrote:
> In a 'perl -d', I try the following command, but it seems that it is
> not working as I expected. Can I input any arbitrary perl commands in
> the 'perl -d' session as if it is running by a perl interpreter?
>
> DB<10> my $count = 10;
>
> DB<11>
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 1:18 AM, Gabor Szabo wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 5:08 AM, Peng Yu wrote:
>> It seems that there are more than one choices of perl interactive
>> shells. I'm wondering which one is best or most popular.
>
> I don't think there is a *best* one. There might be one that f
1 - 100 of 296 matches
Mail list logo
