Hi Ken,
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 15:39:15 -0800
Kenneth Wolcott wrote:
> Hi;
>
> bash file completion seems to fail for perl -d but works for perl -wc
>
> This seems to be the case for Cygwin, Debian and Mac.
>
> Does anyone know how to add support for this or am I mis
Hi;
bash file completion seems to fail for perl -d but works for perl -wc
This seems to be the case for Cygwin, Debian and Mac.
Does anyone know how to add support for this or am I missing something simple?
Thanks,
Ken Wolcott
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: beginners-unsubscr...@perl.org
For
STDERR, ':utf8';
use utf8;
This allows my apps to work gracefully with utf8 data. However, when
I use the debugger (perl -d), I have always had some problems.
Basically, I could see the utf8 literals in my code, but anytime I "p"
or "x", the characters above the low
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 14:05:18 -0800 (PST), Mike Ni wrote:
> At this point, I asked the debugger to dump "$cgi"
> by doing "print $cgi". Instead of dumpping the
> structure, it only say:
>
> "CGI::Base=HASH(0x8294800)"
You might want to type 'h x' in the debugger to find out what 'x' can do for yo
Hey everyone,
I have a simple question about perl's debugger.
Perhpas I am missing something here, yet I am having a
hard time to dump an object's structure such as
"method, variable etc".
For example, I have a simple code snap as folling;
==
$cgi = new CGI::Base;
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike Ni) writes:
>While I was playing with perl's built-in debuger
>(perl -d), I notice that debugger doesn't seem
>care too much about whether a variable is declared?
>
>For example, I would get response of &quo
essage-
> From: Mike Ni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 16 March 2004 5:57 PM
> To: David le Blanc
> Subject: RE: Perl -d
>
>
> Hey David,
>
> Thanks for the information.
>
> BTW, I want to follow up another question, if I may.
> I am still str
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Ni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 16 March 2004 3:46 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Perl -d
>
> Hey everyone,
>
>
> While I was playing with perl's built-in debuger
> (perl -d), I notice
Hey everyone,
While I was playing with perl's built-in debuger
(perl -d), I notice that debugger doesn't seem
care too much about whether a variable is declared?
For example, I would get response of "empty hash" if
I do a "x \%dummy" regardless dummy hasn
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Ni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 15 March 2004 10:43 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Debugging(perl -d)
>
> Hey,
>
> I was handed several perl files written for the Apache
>
Hey,
I was handed several perl files written for the Apache
Web Server. The person who wrote these isn't here any
more.
I need to trace and document the perl files.
I udnerstand there is a built-in debuuger come with
the perl - "!perl -d".
However, since these perl files we
derstand the logic behind all these perl
>files, I want to find a way so I can trace the flow
>and look into the data structure.
>
>In addition to "perl -d", is there better way to do?
>
>Since, these perl scripts were written taking to the
>webserver, therefore the
es, I want to find a way so I can trace the flow
and look into the data structure.
In addition to "perl -d", is there better way to do?
Since, these perl scripts were written taking to the
webserver, therefore the "perl -d" would not work me
very well? Am
on Sun, 01 Sep 2002 15:37:59 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris) wrote:
> My question is
>
> How did perl -d manage to find perldb.pl?
Have you read perldoc perldebug (especially the section on 'Debugger
Customization')?
--
felix
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTEC
">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> I am working with 2 perl distributions on Windows, ActiveState and
>> another 5.6.1 perl on the same computer. I am able to work with one or
>> the another except when debugging. Somehow, perl -d finds perldb.pl
>> when perldb.pl is not
wrote:
>[..]
>> How did perl -d manage to find perldb.pl?
>
>I think the question you are asking is
>
> how does perl find modules that are not
> in the current directory
>
>the answer to that is
>
> @INC
>
>the 'include list' that per
er 5.6.1 perl on the same computer. I am able to work with one or
> the another except when debugging. Somehow, perl -d finds perldb.pl
> when perldb.pl is not in the current folder and not in the system
> path. The only perl environment variable I have is PERLDB_OPTS to
> specify a po
On Sunday, September 1, 2002, at 08:37 , chris wrote:
[..]
> How did perl -d manage to find perldb.pl?
I think the question you are asking is
how does perl find modules that are not
in the current directory
the answer to that is
@INC
the 'include list'
I am working with 2 perl distributions on Windows, ActiveState and
another 5.6.1 perl on the same computer. I am able to work with one or
the another except when debugging. Somehow, perl -d finds perldb.pl
when perldb.pl is not in the current folder and not in the system
path. The only perl
19 matches
Mail list logo