RE: On import v. Just Do It.

> On Jan 20, 2004, at 9:19 AM, Dan Muey wrote: > > > Oops left out a sentence > > sorry for the delay. > > >> p0: yes, one can use an import() from a package > >> to make something like the scam of 'require in line' > > > > Why is it a scam if that's what I want to do for myself? > > I pres

Re: On import v. Just Do It.

On Jan 20, 2004, at 9:19 AM, Dan Muey wrote: Oops left out a sentence sorry for the delay. p0: yes, one can use an import() from a package to make something like the scam of 'require in line' Why is it a scam if that's what I want to do for myself? I presume we are talking about

Re: On import v. Just Do It.

Oops left out a sentence > p0: yes, one can use an import() from a package > to make something like the scam of 'require in line' Why is it a scam if that's what I want to do for myself? > for the twin pragma of 'use strict' and 'use warnings' > { oye! } > > p1: But there is this minor tech

RE: On import v. Just Do It.

> p0: yes, one can use an import() from a package > to make something like the scam of 'require in line' Why is it a scam if that's what I want to do for myself? > for the twin pragma of 'use strict' and 'use warnings' > { oye! } > > p1: But there is this minor technical overhead that > comes wi

On import v. Just Do It.

p0: yes, one can use an import() from a package to make something like the scam of 'require in line' for the twin pragma of 'use strict' and 'use warnings' { oye! } p1: But there is this minor technical overhead that comes with the process - 1.a: one needs to use h2xs to make sure that th