Harry Putnam wrote:
Harry wrote:
This new coding although easier to look at and probably more
efficient, isn't really any faster or at least not appreciably. It
still goes to each and every numbered file.
John replied:
In most file systems the file names are not stored in any particular
order so i
Harry wrote:
>> This new coding although easier to look at and probably more
>> efficient, isn't really any faster or at least not appreciably. It
>> still goes to each and every numbered file.
John replied:
> In most file systems the file names are not stored in any particular
> order so in orde
Harry Putnam wrote:
I want to get a daily list of all the directories under a kind of
large (by home standards) news heirarchy.
I know a little about using File::Find but wonder if there is a better
way.
Here are the things one runs into with File::Find.
if you run it looking for type d (-d) direct
I want to get a daily list of all the directories under a kind of
large (by home standards) news heirarchy.
I know a little about using File::Find but wonder if there is a better
way.
Here are the things one runs into with File::Find.
if you run it looking for type d (-d) directories it still ta
