Taylor James wrote:
>
> Another good idea, which I shall try tonight along with the others,
> or this afternoon if I can get Image::Magick installed on my work PC.
> That's another story!
>
Done that, and revised the code as discussed earlier and it still seems to
be hangign at the same point (j
Wiggins d Anconia wrote:
> I also notice that you catch the return result of 'Write' and then
> warn
> if it is positive, but 'Write' returns the number of images written,
> so
> it should be positive. I suspect this is because it is just test code,
> but you will likely need to correct that befo
> Wiggins d Anconia wrote:
> >
> > HTH,
> >
>
> Indeed, you're right of course. I have a hunch that this is more than a
> resource issue, but of course I should try using less images first to
> eliminate it as a possibility. I'll try later and let you know how I
get on.
>
> I was kind of hopi
Wiggins d Anconia wrote:
>
> HTH,
>
Indeed, you're right of course. I have a hunch that this is more than a
resource issue, but of course I should try using less images first to
eliminate it as a possibility. I'll try later and let you know how I get on.
I was kind of hoping someone would spot
>
> Hi there,
>
> I have 189 gif images at 200x200 and I want to combine them in a 3x61
> arrangement, ending up with a 600x12200 gif. Firstly is this just crazy
> talk? I realise this is a large image, but I've dealt with larger in the
> past.
>
As long as you have the resources...
> Secondly
Hi there,
I have 189 gif images at 200x200 and I want to combine them in a 3x61
arrangement, ending up with a 600x12200 gif. Firstly is this just crazy
talk? I realise this is a large image, but I've dealt with larger in the
past.
Secondly, what the hell am I doing wrong!? My code is below. I ha
