On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 05:51:10PM +0530, Sastry wrote:
> Hi
>
> The test case uses the invariant character that is below <127 on
> ISO-8859-16 codepage. Since character 'a' has a codepoint of 129 on
> EBCDIC, is there a place in the code where it should apply
> NATIVE_TO_ASCII macro on the inp
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 05:01:04PM +0530, Sastry wrote:
> Hi Nicholas
>
> With reference to my previous mail on encoding module
>
> use Encode;
> $string = "a";
> $enc_string = encode("iso-8859-16", $string);
> print "\n String: $string\n";
> print "\n enc_string: $enc_string\n";
>
> a)How diffe
Hi
The test case uses the invariant character that is below <127 on
ISO-8859-16 codepage. Since character 'a' has a codepoint of 129 on
EBCDIC, is there a place in the code where it should apply
NATIVE_TO_ASCII macro on the input character?
-Sastry
On 8/19/05, Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi Nicholas
With reference to my previous mail on encoding module
use Encode;
$string = "a";
$enc_string = encode("iso-8859-16", $string);
print "\n String: $string\n";
print "\n enc_string: $enc_string\n";
a)How different are those ext/Encode/def_t.c and
ext/Encode/Byte/byte_t.c files in EBCDI
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 02:11:45PM +0530, Sastry wrote:
> On 8/9/05, Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 10:58:48AM +0530, Sastry wrote:
> > > > $enc_string = encode("iso-8859-16", $string);
> > So $enc_string should be a single byte, 97, everywhere.
> Can you su
On 8/9/05, Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 10:58:48AM +0530, Sastry wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I get 73 printed on EBCDIC platform. I think it is supposed to print
> > 129 as it is the numeric equivalent of 'a'.
> >
> > -Sastry
> >
> >
> >
> > On 8/8/05, Nicholas Cla
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 10:58:48AM +0530, Sastry wrote:
> Hi
>
> I get 73 printed on EBCDIC platform. I think it is supposed to print
> 129 as it is the numeric equivalent of 'a'.
>
> -Sastry
>
>
>
> On 8/8/05, Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On your EBCDIC platform, what does
Hi Nicholas Clark
I agree that it is supposed to print the numerical equivalent 97.
I attempted to see if there is any bug in the encode module.
Surprisingly, I noticed that there are two .c files in
ext/Encode/def_t.c and ext/Encode/Byte/byte_t.c which are generated
using enc2xs. They are diff
Hi
I get 73 printed on EBCDIC platform. I think it is supposed to print
129 as it is the numeric equivalent of 'a'.
-Sastry
On 8/8/05, Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 11:51:44AM +0530, Sastry wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I am running the following script on EBCDI
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 11:51:44AM +0530, Sastry wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am running the following script on EBCDIC
>
> use Encode;
> $string = "a";
> $enc_string = encode("iso-8859-16", $string);
> print "\n String: $string\n";
> print "\n enc_string: $enc_string\n";
>
>
> The output:
>
> String: a
Hi
I am running the following script on EBCDIC
use Encode;
$string = "a";
$enc_string = encode("iso-8859-16", $string);
print "\n String: $string\n";
print "\n enc_string: $enc_string\n";
The output:
String: a
enc_string: ñ (This is the character for codepoint \xF1 on iso-8859-16)
What is th
Hi
I am getting strange result when I run this Perl Script on EBCDIC
platform. The $enc_string contains >ñ=Á
When I run the same on linux, I get the same string as "ravi". can
someone enlighten me as how the encode method is supposed to work on?
use Encode;
$string = "ravi";
enc_string = encode(
12 matches
Mail list logo
