STROY executed twice
On 6/13/06, Glaessl, Danilo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sub DESTROY {
> exit($exit_code);
> }
I don't think that exit() will do what you might expect, when called from
DESTROY. At that point, the DESTROY hasn't finished, so your objec
On 6/13/06, Glaessl, Danilo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sub DESTROY {
exit($exit_code);
}
I don't think that exit() will do what you might expect, when called
from DESTROY. At that point, the DESTROY hasn't finished, so your
object is still alive, and thus it will need to be
By the way, your "AW" is incorrect. The internet standard is "Re:", in spite
of Microsoft's intentions to mangle the net by "localizing" a convention that
needs no localization. (It's a latin word, not an English abbreviation.)
> "Glaessl" == "Glaessl, Danilo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
G
it up, I am in doubt about the objects being really destroyed by both
the child and the parent...
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Randal L. Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. Juni 2006 16:53
An: beginners@perl.org
Betreff: Re: DESTROY executed twice
> ""Glaessl," == "Glaessl, Danilo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
"Glaessl,> I have a OOP problem. I wrote a script that forks several child
"Glaessl,> processes that in turn create instances of the same class:
The DESTROY is being executed in both the parent and child. There's
really no way ar
Hi,
I have a OOP problem. I wrote a script that forks several child
processes that in turn create instances of the same class:
for (my $i = 0; $i <= 10; $i++) {
defined(my $pid = fork()) or die "Unable to fork: $!";
if ($pid) { # parent process
next;
}
