2009/12/15 Shawn H Corey :
> Philip Potter wrote:
>> 1. Is there a "set" type which holds aggregate data and doesn't care
>> about order, which I could use to compare these results for equality?
>
> You can use a hash as a set or a bag.
Yeah I thought about this -- while I can see how it works wit
Philip Potter wrote:
> 1. Is there a "set" type which holds aggregate data and doesn't care
> about order, which I could use to compare these results for equality?
You can use a hash as a set or a bag.
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;
use Data::Dumper;
# Make Data::Dumper pretty
$Data
Hi all,
I have a method which returns two arrayrefs: one is an array of
hashes, and the other an array of arrays. I'm writing a test harness
for this method, so I put together some testcases and expected
results. I don't care what order the arrays are in; I only care that
the arrayrefs returned by
