--- Peter Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 09:35 AM 6/15/01 -0400, you wrote:
> >So why would you call a reference to an array instead of just
> calling the
> >array itself?
>
> Assuming your question doesn't contain some implication to the thread
> but it just a general question of why an
At 09:35 AM 6/15/01 -0400, you wrote:
>So why would you call a reference to an array instead of just calling the
>array itself?
Assuming your question doesn't contain some implication to the thread but
it just a general question of why an arrayref is useful, why, many
reasons. For one, you can
So why would you call a reference to an array instead of just calling the
array itself?
-Original Message-
From: Peter Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 8:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Can't understand Reference interpret
At 06:04 PM 6/14/01 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Gurus,
Grasshopper,
> The Camel, ( 3rd Ed. ), says,
>-
>$listref->[2][2] = "hello";# pretty clear
>$$listref[2][2] = "hello"; #
Gurus,
The Camel, ( 3rd Ed. ), says,
-
$listref->[2][2] = "hello";# pretty clear
$$listref[2][2] = "hello"; # A bit confusing
This second of these statements may disconcert the C p
