--On Dienstag, 20. November 2001 23:13 -0500 "Scott R. Godin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> well if you do it as $in, it passes a reference. if you do it as %in, it
> passes the hash. I tend to find the referenced value more
> straightforward to work with when using the object-oriented CGI.pm
> i
In article <3852920.1006256205@[10.0.0.140]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Birgit Kellner) wrote:
> Sorry for being stubborn, but I' like to decode multivalued parameters
> *without* identifying them by name.
> That's precisely why reading multiple values into an array is not
> applicable.
that depends
--On Montag, 19. November 2001 21:09 -0500 "Scott R. Godin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
># !/usr/bin/perl -w
> use strict;
> use CGI 2.78 qw(:standard :cgi-lib -no_xhtml);
># if this errors, remove the 2.78
># what version of CGI.pm does your server have?
> print $CGI::VERSION, " CGI.pm installed
In article <56313003.1006216242@[10.0.0.140]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Birgit Kellner) wrote:
> I have tried the following code to read a query-string from a CGI request
> into a hash, taking into account (a) multiple select fields without knowing
> the field name, (b) getting rid of names without
I have tried the following code to read a query-string from a CGI request
into a hash, taking into account (a) multiple select fields without knowing
the field name, (b) getting rid of names without values, and thereby,
hopefully, (c) allowing for user input alternately through a text field or
