On Monday, July 1, 2002, at 02:02 , Felix Geerinckx wrote:
> on Sun, 30 Jun 2002 19:58:09 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Drieux) wrote:
>
>> I guess, that this was
>> consistent with the expectations and standards of
>> other OO coders
>
> Have you already studied Conway's book?
I presume you mean
on Sun, 30 Jun 2002 19:58:09 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Drieux) wrote:
> so as not to conflate the usual 'religious wars' about
> OO v. Proceduralism - forgive me - I needed some
> "emotional reassurance" - I guess, that this was
> consistent with the expectations and standards of
> other OO coders.
On Sunday, June 30, 2002, at 12:33 , Felix Geerinckx wrote:
> on Sun, 30 Jun 2002 16:57:23 GMT, Drieux wrote:
>
>> volks,
> [...Some 180 lines snipped...]
>> ciao
>> drieux
>
> And your beginners question was?
so as not to conflate the usual 'religious wars' about
OO v. Proceduralism - forgive
On Sunday, June 30, 2002, at 11:45 , Daniel Gardner wrote:
> Sunday, June 30, 2002, 5:57:23 PM, drieux wrote:
>
> I don't know if it's just me, but I didn't really understand
> what you're actually trying to achieve...
[..]
> This sounds straightforward:
>
> package FOO::BAR::BOB;
> use base
on Sun, 30 Jun 2002 16:57:23 GMT, Drieux wrote:
> volks,
[...Some 180 lines snipped...]
> ciao
> drieux
And your beginners question was?
--
felix
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sunday, June 30, 2002, 5:57:23 PM, drieux wrote:
I don't know if it's just me, but I didn't really understand
what you're actually trying to achieve...
> Ok, so let's start with the simples stuff, I'm not God's
> brightest child - so I tend to try stuff, and argue with
> myself about whether or
volks,
Ok, so let's start with the simples stuff, I'm not God's
brightest child - so I tend to try stuff, and argue with
myself about whether or not a thing makes sense. Here is
the basic problem.
I need to have a base class
FOO::BAR
from which I will have a secondary class
F
