Rob Anderson wrote:
> Dan,
>
> One thing that springs to mind is that if you're using Windows, you
> can't specify -w on a she-bang (well you can, but windows aint gonna
> do anything with it). Using warnings.pm would force this in the
> script, rather than relying on you webserver, whatever's call
pts.
Hope this helps,
Rob
"Dan Muey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
com...
Hello list,
If I understand this right -w and warnings.pm do the same thing except ::
- warnings.pm is new to Perl 5.6.0
- -w applies to the entire program and warning
From: "Dan Muey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Ok, let me simplify the question.
>
> Does the #!perl -w switch still work on Perl 5.6.0 and later?
Yes. No need to worry.
Jenda
= [EMAIL PROTECTED] === http://Jenda.Krynicky.cz =
When it comes to wine, women and song, wizards are allowed
to get dr
> From: "Dan Muey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Ok, let me simplify the question.
> >
> > Does the #!perl -w switch still work on Perl 5.6.0 and later?
>
> Yes. No need to worry.
Thanks for the peace of mind!
>
> Jenda
> = [EMAIL PROTECTED] === http://Jenda.Krynicky.cz =
> When it comes to
Ok, let me simplify the question.
Does the #!perl -w switch still work on Perl 5.6.0 and later?
Thanks,
Dan
> Hello list,
>
> If I understand this right -w and warnings.pm do the same
> thing except ::
>
> - warnings.pm is new to Perl 5.6.0
> - -w applies
Hello list,
If I understand this right -w and warnings.pm do the same thing except ::
- warnings.pm is new to Perl 5.6.0
- -w applies to the entire program and warnings.pm can be done block leveland
stopped with 'no warnings;'
So my questions is this.
Does -w stil
