[ADMIN] Thread is closed! (Re: [meta] Re: help!)

2001-06-05 Thread Kevin Meltzer
Ok folks, that's enough. Please take personal attacks, personality conflicts, and things of such nature into personal email. This is no longer a useful discussion for beginners, or anyone else. This thread is closed. Cheers, Kevin > On 5 Jun 2001, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > > > > "Chuck" =

Re: [meta] Re: help!

2001-06-05 Thread Paul
--- "Randal L. Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't mind being properly shunned, but let's really look at the > facts here, and if the facts point out to deconstructive behavior, > then RUB MY NOSE in it... don't just handwave. I'm interested in > changing, and looking for feedback to

Re: [meta] Re: help!

2001-06-05 Thread kevin
I got a good Idea, lets fight about somthing that does not matter in the least bit. stop spamming up the list with your little bitch fight. On 5 Jun 2001, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > > "Chuck" == Chuck Ivy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Chuck> Randal, no offence meant, but I was under the

[meta] Re: help!

2001-06-05 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
> "Chuck" == Chuck Ivy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Chuck> Randal, no offence meant, but I was under the impression that the Chuck> purpose of this list was to answer questions, and not say tell new Chuck> users to RTFM. Please point to where I've RTFM'ed someone here, except when the questio