> "(Randal" == (Randal L Schwartz) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
(Randal> I would say that you're not paying attention if you think *this list*
(Randal> has better answers or is faster. Monks beats any list hands down
(Randal> for accuracy and speed.
Ouch. I didn't realize you had crossmailed
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Randal L. Schwartz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Kelly" == Kelly Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Kelly> I have a file with this in it:
> Kelly> a.b = 10
> Kelly> c.d.e = 11
> Kelly> f.g.h.i.j.k = 12
>
> Kelly> Based on that, I want to set:
>
> Kell
> "Richard" == Richard Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Richard> I am still a newbie.. and I used monks for a while. It's extremely
Richard> helpful just like this mailing list. However, I personally prefer
Richard> mailing list as it's easy for me to follow my own question and it's
Richard> b
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
"Kelly" == Kelly Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kelly> I have a file with this in it:
Kelly> a.b = 10
Kelly> c.d.e = 11
Kelly> f.g.h.i.j.k = 12
Kelly> Based on that, I want to set:
Kelly> $HASH{a}{b} = 10;
Kelly> $HASH{c}{d}{e} = 11;
Kelly> $HASH{f}{g
> "Kelly" == Kelly Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kelly> I have a file with this in it:
Kelly> a.b = 10
Kelly> c.d.e = 11
Kelly> f.g.h.i.j.k = 12
Kelly> Based on that, I want to set:
Kelly> $HASH{a}{b} = 10;
Kelly> $HASH{c}{d}{e} = 11;
Kelly> $HASH{f}{g}{h}{i}{j}{k} = 12;
Kelly> This is
