Uri Guttman wrote:
It's generally considered very rude - but the world is full of rude
arseholes. Many of them can be found on the perl list.
which perl list? there are many. do you include yourself as you are on
this list? do you actually help people here (don't recall seeing you in
many thr
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:23:23 +1000, Steve Bertrand
wrote:
I belong to several
technical lists, and the de-facto standard is to Reply-All.
Understood and thank you for your answer.
--
Dave Tang
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: beginners-unsubscr...@perl.org
For additional commands, e-mail: beg
On 2010.02.22 17:44, Uri Guttman wrote:
>> "1" == 120 writes:
>
> >> "off list", as I don't like to clog everyone's email with my thank
> >> you note.
> >>
> 1> It's generally considered very rude - but the world is full of rude
> 1> arseholes. Many of them can be found on the per
> "1" == 120 writes:
>> "off list", as I don't like to clog everyone's email with my thank
>> you note.
>>
1> It's generally considered very rude - but the world is full of rude
1> arseholes. Many of them can be found on the perl list.
which perl list? there are many. do you incl
120 wrote:
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 11:06 +1000, Dave Tang wrote:
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 22:58:24 +1000, 120 wrote:
Apologies for my error - if I may point out that sending 'off list'
replies is also equally rude.
May I ask about this netiquette? I usually thank people who have helped me
"off l
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 11:06 +1000, Dave Tang wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 22:58:24 +1000, 120 wrote:
>
> > Apologies for my error - if I may point out that sending 'off list'
> > replies is also equally rude.
>
> May I ask about this netiquette? I usually thank people who have helped me
> "off
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 22:58:24 +1000, 120 wrote:
Apologies for my error - if I may point out that sending 'off list'
replies is also equally rude.
May I ask about this netiquette? I usually thank people who have helped me
"off list", as I don't like to clog everyone's email with my thank you
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 14:25 +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Friday 19 Feb 2010 14:12:51 120 wrote:
> > I know I can do this:
> >
> > $bitvalue=$bitvalue|32
> >
> > but is there a shorthand for this?
> >
> > $bitvalue=|32 does not appe
Hi,
On Friday 19 Feb 2010 14:12:51 120 wrote:
> I know I can do this:
>
> $bitvalue=$bitvalue|32
>
> but is there a shorthand for this?
>
> $bitvalue=|32 does not appear valid - but I'm sure there is probably a
> way?
Yes, there is:
<<<
I know I can do this:
$bitvalue=$bitvalue|32
but is there a shorthand for this?
$bitvalue=|32 does not appear valid - but I'm sure there is probably a
way?
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: beginners-unsubscr...@perl.org
For additional commands, e-mail: beginners-h...@perl.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brett W. McCoy) wrote on 20 Nov 2001:
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, A. Rivera wrote:
>
>> Is there a quicker way to write this..just curious..
>>
>> $count=&SomeFunctionWitchReturnsaNumber;
>
> $count = func();
>
> (I really hope you are not creating subs with names that long)
I j
On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, A. Rivera wrote:
> Is there a quicker way to write this..just curious..
>
> $count=&SomeFunctionWitchReturnsaNumber;
$count = func();
(I really hope you are not creating subs with names that long)
> $count=$count+1;
$count++;
-- Brett
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 11:04:15AM -0800, A. Rivera wrote:
> Is there a quicker way to write this..just curious..
>
> $count=&SomeFunctionWitchReturnsaNumber;
> $count=$count+1;
$count = SomeFunctionWhichReturnsANumber() + 1;
Z.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional com
Is there a quicker way to write this..just curious..
$count=&SomeFunctionWitchReturnsaNumber;
$count=$count+1;
Thanks,
Agustin
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
14 matches
Mail list logo
