Re: #include or similar

2002-02-26 Thread Jenda Krynicky
> Ok, maybe I should restate the problem. I have a bunch of scripts > which have a couple of lines that chuck some configuration stuff into > some variables. I'm sick of editing the scripts each time the config > changes. I realise that I could use a modules and do stuff like: > > $path = &Conf

Re: #include or similar

2002-02-25 Thread andrew . clark
Subject: Re: #include or similar 26/02/2002

Re: #include or similar

2002-02-25 Thread Agustin Rivera
; return $data; } 1; Agustin Rivera Webmaster, Pollstar.com http://www.pollstar.com - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 4:15 PM Subject: #include or similar > I'm looking for an equivalent to C'

Re: #include or similar

2002-02-25 Thread bob ackerman
i just went through this last week. put a line at top of file to be included like; package Util; at end of file put: 1; name the file Util.pm to include it in another file say: use Util; assume a subroutine in included file called 'foo'. to call it: &Util::foo(); this is the simple version of

RE: #include or similar

2002-02-25 Thread Timothy Johnson
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 4:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: #include or similar I'm looking for an equivalent to C's #include or shell's . in perl, and I can't find it. Can anyone tell me how to include a second file at runtime without writing a modul

#include or similar

2002-02-25 Thread andrew . clark
I'm looking for an equivalent to C's #include or shell's . in perl, and I can't find it. Can anyone tell me how to include a second file at runtime without writing a module? If writing a module is the only way to do it, can someone give a a very simple example of a module? Andrew Clark 90East (